It's Not a Dog-Eat-Dog World, After All
Darwin literally said that many of the social instincts, as he called it, of the animals are represented in our human morality.
Many primates survive by cooperation. The reason they live in groups is that on their own they cannot survive, so they have to have companions from whom they get support. Some live together to help each other find food, or warn each other about predators. So the primates are a very cooperative society in general. They have long-term friendships in that society just like humans have. And, yes, there is competition going on, but when people sometimes describe nature as a dog-eat-dog world, what they mean is that all they see is competition. That’s totally wrong and have I fought against it all my life, against that sort of characterization of animal society because just like human society it is built on a lot of friendship and cooperation at the same time.
I've called this simplification of nature as a dog-eat-dog world veneer theory, because if you think in terms of human morality, it says humans are inherently bad or inherently selfish and competitive. And only with the greatest possible effort can we be moral. Huxley defended that position – Thomas Henry Huxley, a contemporary of Darwin and a defender of Darwin. He defended that position saying that basically we are like a gardener who keeps the garden under control. The garden wants to get out of control – that is our human nature. So we work very hard to be moral. And he could not see morality as a product of evolution.
More recently, some of the biologists such as Robert Wright in The Moral Animal or Richard Dawkins in The Selfish Gene depicted again nature as a battlefield basically where selfish tendencies tend to prevail. And so in the evolution of morality there’s very little room.
I have a very different view. I agree more with Darwin on this. Darwin saw morality as a product of evolution and saw morality as continuous with what we find in other animals. And Darwin literally said that many of the social instincts, as he called it, of the animals are represented in our human morality. So I’m more of a Darwinian than some of these biologists who have pushed morality out of the evolutionary domain.
In Their Own Words is recorded in Big Think's studio.
Image courtesy of Shutterstock
Malcolm Gladwell teaches "Get over yourself and get to work" for Big Think Edge.
- Learn to recognize failure and know the big difference between panicking and choking.
- At Big Think Edge, Malcolm Gladwell teaches how to check your inner critic and get clear on what failure is.
- Subscribe to Big Think Edge before we launch on March 30 to get 20% off monthly and annual memberships.
The 21st century is experiencing an Asianization of politics, business, and culture.
- Our theories about the world, even about history or the geopolitics of the present, tend to be shaped by Anglo perspectives of the Western industrial democracies, particularly those in the United States and the United Kingdom.
- The West, however, is not united. Canada, for instance, acts in many ways that are not in line with American or British policies, particularly in regard to populism. Even if it were united, though, it would not represent most of the world's population.
- European ideas, such as parliamentary democracy and civil service, spread across the world in the 19th century. In the 20th century, American values such as entrepreneurialism went global. In the 21st century, however, what we're seeing now is an Asianization — an Asian confidence that they can determine their own political systems, their own models, and adapt to their own circumstances.
Research has shown that men today have less testosterone than they used to. What's happening?
- Several studies have confirmed that testosterone counts in men are lower than what they used to be just a few decades ago.
- While most men still have perfectly healthy testosterone levels, its reduction puts men at risk for many negative health outcomes.
- The cause of this drop in testosterone isn't entirely clear, but evidence suggests that it is a multifaceted result of modern, industrialized life.
Can sensitive coral reefs survive another human generation?
- Coral reefs may not be able to survive another human decade because of the environmental stress we have placed on them, says author David Wallace-Wells. He posits that without meaningful changes to policies, the trend of them dying out, even in light of recent advances, will continue.
- The World Wildlife Fund says that 60 percent of all vertebrate mammals have died since just 1970. On top of this, recent studies suggest that insect populations may have fallen by as much as 75 percent over the last few decades.
- If it were not for our oceans, the planet would probably be already several degrees warmer than it is today due to the emissions we've expelled into the atmosphere.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.