Economic Jujitsu: the Efficient Market Model
The efficient market model states all security prices today reflect all available information and only new information is going to change the price.
People tried for centuries to predict where asset prices would go, whether it was wheat or gold and eventually the stock market. And eventually, sometime around the ‘60s, academics began to realize that you really couldn’t say what was going to happen tomorrow and that you had, most of the time, no better facility than just chance in saying whether a stock price would go up or down tomorrow.
I like to say they turned that weakness into a strength in a sort of Jujitsu sort of way and said, “Okay, I’m going to make that a principle. Nobody can say what’s going to happen tomorrow because markets are efficient." That’s the core of the efficient market model which states all security prices today reflect all available information and only new information is going to change the price. That's a slightly vague statement that’s saying, "you can’t really be smarter than the market because the market has really reflected all of its information in the price today." And that’s the core of the efficient market model.
And I think it is more or less true. People can’t in the sort term say what’s going to happen to prices tomorrow, although there are obviously counter examples. And it’s not an absolute law like Newton’s Law is, it’s just a sort of tendency. And I don’t have a lot of problem with that. I think the bigger mistake that people have made in the efficient market model is saying that stock prices diffuse like smoke. And everybody knows that, strictly speaking, that's not true, but nobody has a really shorthand better way of describing what stock prices do. And so they rely on this simplified mathematics and if you think about smoke diffusing, it moves very slowly and smoothly. A piece of smoke doesn’t suddenly jump from here to there. It makes its way slowly there by diffusion.
And stock prices do that some of the time, but occasionally, if you look through the last crisis or through the ’87 crash or through almost any couple of months on the stock market, individual stocks jump 10 percent or some piece of news comes out and the market drops 18 or 20 percent in an instant. And that’s not diffusion, that’s a crash, that’s a jump, that’s something violent.
In the efficient market model as traditionally interpreted, it doesn’t allow for those kinds of violent sorts of behavior. And really, that violent behavior more or less happens a lot of the time. So that’s one of the big flaws of the model. And I think that people who work with the model know that it’s wrong. It’s not like they’re really stupid and they think its gospel. But at the same time, they don’t have a simple way of doing better.
In Their Own Words is recorded in Big Think's studio.
Image courtesy of Shutterstock
Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.
No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.
A completely unexpected discovery beneath the ice.
- Scientists find remains of a tardigrade and crustaceans in a deep, frozen Antarctic lake.
- The creatures' origin is unknown, and further study is ongoing.
- Biology speaks up about Antarctica's history.
She met mere mortals with and without the Vatican's approval.
- For centuries, the Virgin Mary has appeared to the faithful, requesting devotion and promising comfort.
- These maps show the geography of Marian apparitions – the handful approved by the Vatican, and many others.
- Historically, Europe is where most apparitions have been reported, but the U.S. is pretty fertile ground too.
It's one factor that can help explain the religiosity gap.
- Sociologists have long observed a gap between the religiosity of men and women.
- A recent study used data from several national surveys to compare religiosity, risk-taking preferences and demographic information among more than 20,000 American adolescents.
- The results suggest that risk-taking preferences might partly explain the gender differences in religiosity.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.