All of Technology Conspires to Give Us a Richer Life, and That Won't Change

All technologies conspire to give ordinary people more information, more tools, more resources, more ways to connect with each other, more ways to influence conversations.

Technology is always surprising.  I have no idea whether in 2016 or 2020 Facebook is still going to be what it is.  Maybe it will be even bigger.  Who knows?  Maybe something new will have taken over. 

Go visit a college campus and ask how many people have Snapchat.  You will not find one person who does not have Snapchat.  Is that going to be the case in four years?  I have no idea.  I do know that the overall direction of these technologies is quite clear and is not going to be reversed.  All of them collectively - whether one particular company does a better job getting users than the other - all of them collectively, sort of conspire to give ordinary people more information, more tools, more resources, more ways to connect with each other, more ways to influence conversations. They give us more power and a richer life.  And that’s not going to change.

Whatever technology comes and goes, the ability of a candidate or, for that matter, a brand to connect with people and show the people that they respect them and are about them and want to empower them is going to be increasingly important to the outcome because people aren’t going to tolerate anything less. There’s going to be a competitor who does respect that stuff and who does get that stuff.  

Come 2016, is it conceivable that a candidate who’s a digital luddite wins?  Sure.  But that’s going to be a real disadvantage for them.  Could a candidate win without TV ads?  Perhaps, but that’s going to be a real disadvantage for them. 

That’s only going to be more true in 2020.  And it’s not about tactics.  It’s not about finding the best possible copywriter for Facebook and Tumbler.  That doesn’t hurt.  You should go try to find a really good copywriter, but it’s about something more philosophical than that.  People have a different relationship now to the organizations they care about, in politics, to the brands they care about than they ever had before. 

The thing we used to say on the campaign is that in 2008 if we’d been not local enough, not timely enough, just off our game that wouldn’t have been good and people might have clicked away.  In 2012, they’d click away and Tweet about why they lost confidence in the President.  And that’s a really fundamental difference in terms of the power that people have.  We weren’t just risking losing them if we were off our game.  We were risking losing their entire network. 

That’s only going to become more and more true.  And so again, it's going to be the case that people are going to have more power in 2016 than they had in 2012 and more power in 2020 than they had in 2016.  And the candidates who get that and respect that and try to use that in a positive way rather than trying to play an inside game or trying to pretend like they get that but not without really getting it are going to be the ones that succeed or at least have a big leg up over their competitors. 

In Their Own Words is recorded in Big Think's studio.

Image courtesy of Shutterstock

Related Articles

Scientists discover what caused the worst mass extinction ever

How a cataclysm worse than what killed the dinosaurs destroyed 90 percent of all life on Earth.

Credit: Ron Miller
Surprising Science

While the demise of the dinosaurs gets more attention as far as mass extinctions go, an even more disastrous event called "the Great Dying” or the “End-Permian Extinction” happened on Earth prior to that. Now scientists discovered how this cataclysm, which took place about 250 million years ago, managed to kill off more than 90 percent of all life on the planet.

Keep reading Show less

Why we're so self-critical of ourselves after meeting someone new

A new study discovers the “liking gap” — the difference between how we view others we’re meeting for the first time, and the way we think they’re seeing us.

New acquaintances probably like you more than you think. (Photo by Simone Joyner/Getty Images)
Surprising Science

We tend to be defensive socially. When we meet new people, we’re often concerned with how we’re coming off. Our anxiety causes us to be so concerned with the impression we’re creating that we fail to notice that the same is true of the other person as well. A new study led by Erica J. Boothby, published on September 5 in Psychological Science, reveals how people tend to like us more in first encounters than we’d ever suspect.

Keep reading Show less

NASA launches ICESat-2 into orbit to track ice changes in Antarctica and Greenland

Using advanced laser technology, scientists at NASA will track global changes in ice with greater accuracy.

Firing three pairs of laser beams 10,000 times per second, the ICESat-2 satellite will measure how long it takes for faint reflections to bounce back from ground and sea ice, allowing scientists to measure the thickness, elevation and extent of global ice

Leaving from Vandenberg Air Force base in California this coming Saturday, at 8:46 a.m. ET, the Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite-2 — or, the "ICESat-2" — is perched atop a United Launch Alliance Delta II rocket, and when it assumes its orbit, it will study ice layers at Earth's poles, using its only payload, the Advance Topographic Laser Altimeter System (ATLAS).

Keep reading Show less