All of Technology Conspires to Give Us a Richer Life, and That Won't Change
All technologies conspire to give ordinary people more information, more tools, more resources, more ways to connect with each other, more ways to influence conversations.
Teddy Goff was the Digital Director for President Obama’s 2012 campaign. In that capacity, he oversaw a team of more than 200 people nationwide, who collectively raised more than $500 million, registered more than a million voters online, built Facebook and Twitter followings of more than 45 and 33 million people respectively, generated more than 100 million video views, ran the largest online advertising program in political history, built groundbreaking tools for online fundraising and campaigning, and organized more than 150,000 active volunteers and 300,000 offline events through their proprietary organizing platform, Dashboard. As a member of campaign leadership, he also played a critical role in developing and executing the broader campaign's strategy for fundraising, organizing, and communications.
Before joining the campaign, Teddy served as Associate Vice President for Strategy at Blue State Digital, in which capacity he oversaw the account managers and creative teams servicing more than 75 active engagements across the globe. He also personally directed programs for Senator Edward M. Kennedy, Partners In Health, American Express, Carnegie Hall, and the Metropolitan Museum of Art, among others.
On President Obama's 2008 campaign, Teddy was responsible for state-level digital campaigns, overseeing everything from email and social media programs to online organizing strategies in more than 25 battleground states. During the primaries, he helped lead President Obama's mass email team, writing and editing fundraising, recruitment, and messaging emails and developing communications and segmentation plans. After that campaign, Teddy oversaw the creation and launch of the Obama Administration's new WhiteHouse.gov as a member of the Presidential Transition Team.
Technology is always surprising. I have no idea whether in 2016 or 2020 Facebook is still going to be what it is. Maybe it will be even bigger. Who knows? Maybe something new will have taken over.
Go visit a college campus and ask how many people have Snapchat. You will not find one person who does not have Snapchat. Is that going to be the case in four years? I have no idea. I do know that the overall direction of these technologies is quite clear and is not going to be reversed. All of them collectively - whether one particular company does a better job getting users than the other - all of them collectively, sort of conspire to give ordinary people more information, more tools, more resources, more ways to connect with each other, more ways to influence conversations. They give us more power and a richer life. And that’s not going to change.
Whatever technology comes and goes, the ability of a candidate or, for that matter, a brand to connect with people and show the people that they respect them and are about them and want to empower them is going to be increasingly important to the outcome because people aren’t going to tolerate anything less. There’s going to be a competitor who does respect that stuff and who does get that stuff.
Come 2016, is it conceivable that a candidate who’s a digital luddite wins? Sure. But that’s going to be a real disadvantage for them. Could a candidate win without TV ads? Perhaps, but that’s going to be a real disadvantage for them.
That’s only going to be more true in 2020. And it’s not about tactics. It’s not about finding the best possible copywriter for Facebook and Tumbler. That doesn’t hurt. You should go try to find a really good copywriter, but it’s about something more philosophical than that. People have a different relationship now to the organizations they care about, in politics, to the brands they care about than they ever had before.
The thing we used to say on the campaign is that in 2008 if we’d been not local enough, not timely enough, just off our game that wouldn’t have been good and people might have clicked away. In 2012, they’d click away and Tweet about why they lost confidence in the President. And that’s a really fundamental difference in terms of the power that people have. We weren’t just risking losing them if we were off our game. We were risking losing their entire network.
That’s only going to become more and more true. And so again, it's going to be the case that people are going to have more power in 2016 than they had in 2012 and more power in 2020 than they had in 2016. And the candidates who get that and respect that and try to use that in a positive way rather than trying to play an inside game or trying to pretend like they get that but not without really getting it are going to be the ones that succeed or at least have a big leg up over their competitors.
In Their Own Words is recorded in Big Think's studio.
Image courtesy of Shutterstock
How a cataclysm worse than what killed the dinosaurs destroyed 90 percent of all life on Earth.
While the demise of the dinosaurs gets more attention as far as mass extinctions go, an even more disastrous event called "the Great Dying” or the “End-Permian Extinction” happened on Earth prior to that. Now scientists discovered how this cataclysm, which took place about 250 million years ago, managed to kill off more than 90 percent of all life on the planet.
A new study discovers the “liking gap” — the difference between how we view others we’re meeting for the first time, and the way we think they’re seeing us.
We tend to be defensive socially. When we meet new people, we’re often concerned with how we’re coming off. Our anxiety causes us to be so concerned with the impression we’re creating that we fail to notice that the same is true of the other person as well. A new study led by Erica J. Boothby, published on September 5 in Psychological Science, reveals how people tend to like us more in first encounters than we’d ever suspect.
Using advanced laser technology, scientists at NASA will track global changes in ice with greater accuracy.
Leaving from Vandenberg Air Force base in California this coming Saturday, at 8:46 a.m. ET, the Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite-2 — or, the "ICESat-2" — is perched atop a United Launch Alliance Delta II rocket, and when it assumes its orbit, it will study ice layers at Earth's poles, using its only payload, the Advance Topographic Laser Altimeter System (ATLAS).
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.