Would You Visit A National Park On The Moon?
Earlier this month, the Apollo Lunar Landing Legacy Act was introduced as a bill in Congress, proposing that the spot where the Apollo 11 team landed be made a national park. Reactions range from ridicule to enthusiasm.
Kecia Lynn has worked as a technical writer, editor, software developer, arts administrator, summer camp director, and television host. A graduate of Case Western Reserve University and the Iowa Writers' Workshop, she is currently living in Iowa City and working on her first novel.
What’s the Latest Development?
This month, Rep. Donna Edwards (D-MD) introduced a bill in Congress that would make the landing site of the 1969 Apollo 11 mission a national historical site. According to Edwards, the Apollo Lunar Landing Legacy Act would help preserve the location for future generations "as spacefaring commercial entities and foreign nations begin to achieve the technical capabilities necessary to land spacecraft on the surface of the moon." One response came last week from Citizens Against Government Waste, which gave Edwards a "Porker of the Month" award "for engaging in sheer 'lunarcy'."
What’s the Big Idea?
While historic preservation is certainly important, and concerns around a private mission carelessly desecrating the Apollo 11 landing site are valid, it's highly unlikely that the US will try to claim the area as its own. Michael Listner, founder of New Hampshire-based Space Law and Policy Solutions, says the creation of national parks “requires sovereign control over the real property…Since the Outer Space Treaty prohibits sovereign claims over the moon, any attempt to create a National Park…will fail.” However, novelist Homer Hickam, whose latest book includes lunar tourism, is all for the idea. “To hell with any past agreements we've had…they are passé. That's sacred American soil as far as I'm concerned.”
Giving our solar system a "slap in the face."
- A stream of galactic debris is hurtling at us, pulling dark matter along with it
- It's traveling so quickly it's been described as a hurricane of dark matter
- Scientists are excited to set their particle detectors at the onslffaught
The climate change we're witnessing is more dramatic than we might think.
A lazy buzz phrase – 'Is this the new normal?' – has been doing the rounds as extreme climate events have been piling up over the past year. To which the riposte should be: it's worse than that – we're on the road to even more frequent, more extreme events than we saw this year.
Once again, our circadian rhythm points the way.
- Seven individuals were locked inside a windowless, internetless room for 37 days.
- While at rest, they burned 130 more calories at 5 p.m. than at 5 a.m.
- Morning time again shown not to be the best time to eat.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.