Apple Mesmerizes Us Without Having the Best Products

Even though we can get better, faster, cheaper products elsewhere, the market always goes with Apple.

We all come rushing when Apple calls. Tech consumers and businesses prefer Apple products even though other companies have superior products. But why?


It's an astounding phenomenon, writes Vlad Savov of The Verge. Take Apple Pay for instance. Savov writes, “Apple strode into a fragmented, fiercely territorial and competitive field and managed to unite everyone, primarily on the strength of the iPhone’s unique history of creating industries and revenue sources where there once were none.”

There are technologies and capabilities that can be found in products years ahead of Apple.

If we're judging purely based on specs, there are better options out there for sure. There are technologies and capabilities that can be found in products years ahead of Apple. The most recent Apple announcement saw the “revolutionary” new force touch added to its list of cool gesture controls, a feature the Huawei Mate S has. Likewise, the iOS 9 update promised multitasking capabilities on its latest iPad Air and new iPad Pro. What's more, a handy stylus accessory can be bought with its iPad Pro. These are things Samsung's tablets have had for years now. So, why do we buy what every other company already offers?

Apple is expected to "turn that technology into a transformative new mode of interaction."

Because, writes Savov, only Apple is expected to “turn that technology into a transformative new mode of interaction.” It's all about looking at Apple and what it has done with its products in the context of the company's history.

There are some people that want “bigger, faster, cheaper” products — these are things the market always demands, says social media guru Guy Kawasaki. But the difference between Apple and everyone else is Apple “creates a product or service before people can really define the need for that product or service.”

Personal Growth

The life choices that had led me to be sitting in a booth underneath a banner that read “Ask a Philosopher" – at the entrance to the New York City subway at 57th and 8th – were perhaps random but inevitable.

Keep reading Show less

For thousands of years, humans slept in two shifts. Should we do it again?

Researchers believe that the practice of sleeping through the whole night didn’t really take hold until just a few hundred years ago.

The Bed by Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec.
Surprising Science

She was wide awake and it was nearly two in the morning. When asked if everything was alright, she said, “Yes.” Asked why she couldn’t get to sleep she said, “I don’t know.” Neuroscientist Russell Foster of Oxford might suggest she was exhibiting “a throwback to the bi-modal sleep pattern." Research suggests we used to sleep in two segments with a period of wakefulness in-between.

Keep reading Show less

'Self is not entirely lost in dementia,' argues new review

The assumption "that without memory, there can be no self" is wrong, say researchers.

Photo credit: Darren Hauck / Getty Images
Mind & Brain

In the past when scholars have reflected on the psychological impact of dementia they have frequently referred to the loss of the "self" in dramatic and devastating terms, using language such as the "unbecoming of the self" or the "disintegration" of the self. In a new review released as a preprint at PsyArXiv, an international team of psychologists led by Muireann Irish at the University of Sydney challenge this bleak picture which they attribute to the common, but mistaken, assumption "that without memory, there can be no self" (as encapsulated by the line from Hume: "Memory alone… 'tis to be considered… as the source of personal identity").

Keep reading Show less