The Digital Revolution Is Totally Screwing Songwriters
A new book offers insights into the makers of earworms you can't escape.
"...Baby One More Time" and Britney Spears. "I Kissed A Girl" and Katy Perry. "Since U Been Gone" and Kelly Clarkson. Pop music’s biggest hits are almost inseparable from their performers. As John Seabrook reminds us in his new book The Song Machine, this is by design, even when those performers have very little input in the actual songwriting and production process. More tellingly, Seabrook paints a picture of a disturbingly homogenized “hit factory” that uses these performers as mere packaging for what amounts to the work of a select few hit-makers.
"If songwriters can't afford to work, then the whole hit-making apparatus of the song machine is doomed." — John Seabrook
Current hit songwriters/producers like Max Martin, who has written more chart-topping hits than the Beatles, are, contrary to popular opinion, nothing new. They harken back to the days of Tin Pan Alley, the hub of the music industry in the late 19th and early 20th century, as well as to the Ford-like line of production within the Motown label in the 1960s. That they exist within a new business model that values singles over albums, and amidst a digital revolution that has recently come under attack, makes them a perfect example of why the music industry has yet to recover from the so-called “Napster effect.”
Indeed, while songwriters are increasingly the force behind pop music (rather than those artists who perform them), they are the ones left most vulnerable to the new digital music ecosystem. Taylor Swift has publicly rallied against services like Spotify for the meager royalties she receives from making her catalogue available to be streamed. According to SpotifyArtists, artists earn on average less than one cent per play, between $0.006 and $0.0084. That ends up being a large paycheck for someone like Swift, but it leaves songwriters and smaller artists with very little to show for it. While songwriters and music publishers are set to get 10 cents for every copy made of a song, that goes down to 0.04 of a cent per stream on Spotify in the U.S.
For a current music landscape that depends more heavily on strong songwriters to perpetuate itself, this schism is sure to continue rocking the boat. “If songwriters can’t afford to work,” Seabrook writes, “then the whole hit-making apparatus of the song machine is doomed.”
Jonathan Taplin of the USC Annenberg Innovation Lab argues that piracy is problematic because it forces the content economy to seek out new revenue streams that are anything but a sure thing.
Photo by Tim Whitby/Getty Images
Manuel is a NYC-based writer interested in all things media and pop culture. He's a regular contributor to The Film Experience and Remezcla. His work has been featured in Mic News, Film Comment, and Model View Culture. He also has a PhD but hates bragging about it. www.mbetancourt.com
Giving our solar system a "slap in the face"
- A stream of galactic debris is hurtling at us, pulling dark matter along with it
- It's traveling so quickly it's been described as a hurricane of dark matter
- Scientists are excited to set their particle detectors at the onslffaught
Bernardo Kastrup proposes a new ontology he calls “idealism” built on panpsychism, the idea that everything in the universe contains consciousness. He solves problems with this philosophy by adding a new suggestion: The universal mind has dissociative identity disorder.
There’s a reason they call it the “hard problem.” Consciousness: Where is it? What is it? No one single perspective seems to be able to answer all the questions we have about consciousness. Now Bernardo Kastrup thinks he’s found one. He calls his ontology idealism, and according to idealism, all of us and all we perceive are manifestations of something very much like a cosmic-scale dissociative identity disorder (DID). He suggests there’s an all-encompassing universe-wide consciousness, it has multiple personalities, and we’re them.
Is the appendix a useless organ, an immune system benefactor, a Parkinson's disease instigator, or all of the above?
- As far back as Darwin, scientists have thought the appendix was a vestigial organ, but opinions have changed in recent years.
- A new study found that the appendix houses Lewy bodies, abnormal protein deposits that contribute to Parkinson's disease.
- Researchers suggest an appendectomy may lower one's risk of Parkinson's, while other research suggests the appendix has important roles to play in our immune system.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.