Why Superstars Dominate Sports
The super-human abilities of sports superstars like Roger Federer and Tiger Woods are self-fulfilling prophecies, says Jonah Lehrer. Because of their status, their opponents choke.
What's the Latest Development?
It seems Roger Federer and Tiger Woods have begun the slow, humbling fade that sports superstars inevitably learn about in time. The explanation for their previous, practically unheard-of success is part physical and part mental, says Jonah Lehrer. What is called "the superstar effect" gives some superior athletes a big mental edge in competition. Why? Some opponents see defeat as a foregone conclusion so do not commit themselves to the game while others, overly anxious about performing well, commit mistakes they otherwise wouldn't.
What's the Big Idea?
While sport is typically thought of as a competition between the physical abilities of athletes, any casual observer has noticed the importance of mental toughness as well. It seems especially difficult for opponents to overcome the superstar effect and this, more than a sheer physical advantage, helps to explain why some athletes tower over their competitors during the height of their careers. When their powers begin to diminish, however, their competitors feel revived and begin to believe they can rise to the challenge. They often do and our sports heroes learn a lesson in humility.
Research in plant neurobiology shows that plants have senses, intelligence and emotions.
- The field of plant neurobiology studies the complex behavior of plants.
- Plants were found to have 15-20 senses, including many like humans.
- Some argue that plants may have awareness and intelligence, while detractors persist.
Most people think human extinction would be bad. These people aren't philosophers.
- A new opinion piece in The New York Times argues that humanity is so horrible to other forms of life that our extinction wouldn't be all that bad, morally speaking.
- The author, Dr. Todd May, is a philosopher who is known for advising the writers of The Good Place.
- The idea of human extinction is a big one, with lots of disagreement on its moral value.
Since the idea of locality is dead, space itself may not be an aloof vacuum: Something welds things together, even at great distances.
- Realists believe that there is an exactly understandable way the world is — one that describes processes independent of our intervention. Anti-realists, however, believe realism is too ambitious — too hard. They believe we pragmatically describe our interactions with nature — not truths that are independent of us.
- In nature, properties of Particle B may depend on what we choose to measure or manipulate with Particle A, even at great distances.
- In quantum mechanics, there is no explanation for this. "It just comes out that way," says Smolin. Realists struggle with this because it would imply certain things can travel faster than light, which still seems improbable.