Genetic Engineers Say GMOs Are Harmful
Genetic engineers have penned a report on why genetically-modified food is dangerous.
Article written by guest writer Rin Mitchell
What’s the Latest Development?
According to a report entitled “GMO Myths and Truths,” genetic engineers are worried that genetically-engineered food is dangerous. It has been claimed that genetic engineering is an extension of natural plant breeding; however, natural breeding takes place only between related kinds of life “genetic engineering happens in a lab, where tissue cultured plant cells undergo a GM gene insertion process that couldn’t happen in nature.” According to the engineers, the problem is that genetic engineering is "imprecise and results can be unpredictable" due to change in the type of nutrition in food, how a crop performs and toxic effects. “Every generation of GMO crops interact with more organisms, creating more opportunities for unwanted side effects." Food regulations in regards to GMO can vary on a country-by-country basis, for example in the U.S. the FDA only uses a voluntary program to review GMO foods before they go on the market.
What’s the Big Idea?
Based on a report by genetic engineers, GMO food crops are toxic in three ways: "The genetically modified gene itself; mutagenic or gene regulatory effects created by the GMO transformation process; and toxic residues created by farming practices." Although GMO technology is improving in precision, engineers warn that accidents can happen because "plant biotechnologists don’t really know much at all about crop genomes--so inserting genes at a supposedly safe area could still lead to all sorts of side effects."
The ability to speak clearly, succinctly, and powerfully is easier than you think
The ability to communicate effectively can make or break a person's assessment of your intelligence, competence, and authenticity.
Antimicrobial resistance is growing worldwide, rendering many "work horse" medicines ineffective. Without intervention, drug-resistant pathogens could lead to millions of deaths by 2050. Thankfully, companies like Pfizer are taking action.
- Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens are one of the largest threats to global health today.
- As we get older, our immune systems age, increasing our risk of life threatening infections. Without reliable antibiotics, life expectancy could decline for the first time in modern history.
- If antibiotics become ineffective, common infections could result in hospitalization or even death. Life-saving interventions like cancer treatments and organ transplantation would become more difficult, more often resulting in death. Routine procedures would become hard to perform.
- Without intervention, resistant pathogens could result in 10 million annual deaths by 2050.
- By taking a multi-faceted approach—inclusive of adherence to good stewardship, surveillance and responsible manufacturing practices, as well as an emphasis on prevention and treatment—companies like Pfizer are fighting to help curb the spread.
The climate change we're witnessing is more dramatic than we might think.
A lazy buzz phrase – 'Is this the new normal?' – has been doing the rounds as extreme climate events have been piling up over the past year. To which the riposte should be: it's worse than that – we're on the road to even more frequent, more extreme events than we saw this year.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.