Why Countries Rich in Resources End Up Poor
According to reports, the new discoveries of natural resources in African countries like Ghana Uganda, Tanzania or Mozambique can either be a blessing or a curse.
Article written by guest writer Rin Mitchell
What’s the Latest Development?
In several African countries new natural resources have turned up, but experts believe it doesn't necessarily mean they will be less poorer than before the discovery of the resources. It can be a blessing or a curse. Countries that are rich in natural resources and revenue rely on them to finance education, health care, development and redistribution. Yet, they grow more slowly and with “great inequality.” Three of the well-known curses are: strong currencies, which impede other imports, rise in unemployment due to resource extraction and volatile prices of resources that cause instability. “Moreover, resource-rich countries often do not pursue sustainable growth strategies. They fail to recognize that if they do not reinvest their resource wealth into productive investments above ground, they are actually becoming poorer.”
What’s the Big Idea?
To be rich in natural resources can cause problems politically and economically, unless the right measures are taken. Some ways to avoid such curses are lowering the exchange rate, stabilizing funds, taking the necessary precautions with resource revenue investments, ban borrowing and allowing citizens to see the money coming in and going out. “Newly enriched countries need to take several more steps in order to increase the likelihood of a ‘resource blessing.’”
Our experience of time may be blinding us to its true nature, say scientists.
- Time may not be passing at all, says the Block Universe Theory.
- Time travel may be possible.
- Your perception of time is likely relative to you and limited.
From questionable shipwrecks to outright attacks, they clearly don't want to be bothered.
- Many have tried to contact the Sentinelese, to write about them, or otherwise.
- But the inhabitants of the 23 square mile island in the Bay of Bengal don't want anything to do with the outside world.
- Their numbers are unknown, but either 40 or 500 remain.
At least he wasn't burned at the stake, right?
- The letter suggests Galileo censored himself a bit in order to fly more under the radar. It didn't work, though.
- The Royal Society Journal will publish the variants of the letters shortly, and scholars will begin to analyze the results.
- The letter was in obscurity for hundreds of years in Royal Society Library in London.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.