Why A Little Less Trust Between Partners Is A Good Thing

When it comes to online security and personal data, that is: A report released this week by security firm McAfee provides some interesting information about what it means to overshare.

What's the Latest Development?


Released this week, findings from a survey conducted by online security firm McAfee revealed that not enough people take adequate precautions with the type of personal data stored on their mobile devices. For example, only 40 percent of smartphone users have their phones password-protected, yet more than two-thirds said they contain e-mail passwords, credit card numbers, and even intimate photos. In addition, says McAfee security expert Robert Siciliano, "sharing passwords [between partners] has become a sign of commitment, a signal of love and devotion, like a varsity sweater or friendship ring." Amazingly, 94 percent of respondents surveyed said they share personal information with their family and friends. 

What's the Big Idea?

As expected, with such openness, problems can and do occur. Most people who have their partner's passwords use them for snooping, but what they find can and does lead to conflict: 45 percent of data theft cases occurred because the person being snooped on was lying, and 41 percent "were a direct result of infidelity." Despite this, 36 percent of those surveyed still planned to send potentially compromising images and text to their significant others this Valentine's Day.

Photo Credit: Shutterstock.com

Read it at International Business Times

Plants have awareness and intelligence, argue scientists

Research in plant neurobiology shows that plants have senses, intelligence and emotions.

Getty Images
Surprising Science
  • The field of plant neurobiology studies the complex behavior of plants.
  • Plants were found to have 15-20 senses, including many like humans.
  • Some argue that plants may have awareness and intelligence, while detractors persist.
Keep reading Show less

Human extinction! Don't panic; think about it like a philosopher.

Most people think human extinction would be bad. These people aren't philosophers.

Shutterstock
Politics & Current Affairs
  • A new opinion piece in The New York Times argues that humanity is so horrible to other forms of life that our extinction wouldn't be all that bad, morally speaking.
  • The author, Dr. Todd May, is a philosopher who is known for advising the writers of The Good Place.
  • The idea of human extinction is a big one, with lots of disagreement on its moral value.
Keep reading Show less

Space is dead: A challenge to the standard model of quantum mechanics

Since the idea of locality is dead, space itself may not be an aloof vacuum: Something welds things together, even at great distances.

Videos
  • Realists believe that there is an exactly understandable way the world is — one that describes processes independent of our intervention. Anti-realists, however, believe realism is too ambitious — too hard. They believe we pragmatically describe our interactions with nature — not truths that are independent of us.
  • In nature, properties of Particle B may depend on what we choose to measure or manipulate with Particle A, even at great distances.
  • In quantum mechanics, there is no explanation for this. "It just comes out that way," says Smolin. Realists struggle with this because it would imply certain things can travel faster than light, which still seems improbable.
Keep reading Show less