The Case For Adding A "Respect" Option
A University of Texas-Austin study showed that test subjects presented with a comments section that had a "Respect" option tended to select it more often for comments that opposed their own viewpoint.
Kecia Lynn has worked as a technical writer, editor, software developer, arts administrator, summer camp director, and television host. A graduate of Case Western Reserve University and the Iowa Writers' Workshop, she is currently living in Iowa City and working on her first novel.
What's the Latest Development?
A report from the Engaging News Project at the University of Texas-Austin describes study results that researchers say could help improve communications on social media and, by extension, benefit the democratic process. In one experiment, a group of participants were asked to read the comments sections associated with articles on a typical online news site. Next to each comment was a button that read "Like," "Recommend," or "Respect" depending on the participant. Those who saw the "Respect" option were up to 50 percent more likely to select it for those comments that opposed their own viewpoints.
What's the Big Idea?
The Engaging News Project's primary goal is to help news organizations involve their audiences in different ways using research-based techniques. Director Natalie Stroud says the study results help prove that "the word choices used for social media buttons are consequential and can encourage readers to engage with and show appreciation for opposing points of view—practices that are crucial to democracy." Another finding from the study showed that comments sections tended to be more civil when journalists took part in the discussion.
Photo Credit: Shutterstock.com
Giving our solar system a "slap in the face"
- A stream of galactic debris is hurtling at us, pulling dark matter along with it
- It's traveling so quickly it's been described as a hurricane of dark matter
- Scientists are excited to set their particle detectors at the onslffaught
Bernardo Kastrup proposes a new ontology he calls “idealism” built on panpsychism, the idea that everything in the universe contains consciousness. He solves problems with this philosophy by adding a new suggestion: The universal mind has dissociative identity disorder.
There’s a reason they call it the “hard problem.” Consciousness: Where is it? What is it? No one single perspective seems to be able to answer all the questions we have about consciousness. Now Bernardo Kastrup thinks he’s found one. He calls his ontology idealism, and according to idealism, all of us and all we perceive are manifestations of something very much like a cosmic-scale dissociative identity disorder (DID). He suggests there’s an all-encompassing universe-wide consciousness, it has multiple personalities, and we’re them.
Once again, our circadian rhythm points the way.
- Seven individuals were locked inside a windowless, internetless room for 37 days.
- While at rest, they burned 130 more calories at 5 p.m. than at 5 a.m.
- Morning time again shown not to be the best time to eat.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.