Study: Men and Women Chew Differently
Ever wonder why men finish their meals faster than women? No? Maybe? Well, a recent study shows men eat with more “chewing power” than women and take larger bites.
Natalie has been writing professionally for about 6 years. After graduating from Ithaca College with a degree in Feature Writing, she snagged a job at PCMag.com where she had the opportunity to review all the latest consumer gadgets. Since then she has become a writer for hire, freelancing for various websites. In her spare time, you may find her riding her motorcycle, reading YA novels, hiking, or playing video games. Follow her on Twitter: @nat_schumaker
Ever wonder why men finish their meals faster than women? No? Maybe? Well, Munchies reported on a recent study by Soojin Park and Weon-Sun Shin that show men eat with more “chewing power” than women and take larger bites, resulting in a clean plate in a shorter amount of time.
The research, published in the medical journal Physiology & Behavior, began as a study looking into people's chewing patterns and its relationship to weight, but the results yielded something quite different. The team of researchers took 24 male and 24 female students from the Semyung University in South Korea — a pretty small study group. The participants were hooked up with electrodes in their jaws to measure chewing patterns and muscle activity while they ate. The researchers then served the participants 152 grams of boiled white rice. This allowed the researchers to measure the amount of food they took in at once, chews per mouthful, amount of force behind those chews, length of time to complete the meal, and so on.
The results showed the men took larger bites than women and chewed with more force, which translated into faster food consumption compared to the women. The female participants, however, chewed at the same pace as men, but chewed each mouthful more times before swallowing.
There is some dispute as to whether these results are valid. Munchies referenced an article in The New Yorker that disputes the researchers' claims that there's a difference between the eating patterns in men and women, writing that another study saw no difference in gum chewing between men and women. But then again, people's approach to food may be different than a non-consumable piece of gum.
Of course, further research is necessary in order to confirm these results.
Read more at Munchies.
Photo Credit: Christian Scheja/Flickr
A guide to making difficult conversations possible—and peaceful—in an increasingly polarized nation.
- How can we reach out to people on the other side of the divide? Get to know the other person as a human being before you get to know them as a set of tribal political beliefs, says Sarah Ruger. Don't launch straight into the difficult topics—connect on a more basic level first.
- To bond, use icebreakers backed by neuroscience and psychology: Share a meal, watch some comedy, see awe-inspiring art, go on a tough hike together—sharing tribulation helps break down some of the mental barriers we have between us. Then, get down to talking, putting your humanity before your ideology.
- The Charles Koch Foundation is committed to understanding what drives intolerance and the best ways to cure it. The foundation supports interdisciplinary research to overcome intolerance, new models for peaceful interactions, and experiments that can heal fractured communities. For more information, visit charleskochfoundation.org/courageous-collaborations.
Progressive America would be half as big, but twice as populated as its conservative twin.
- America's two political tribes have consolidated into 'red' and 'blue' nations, with seemingly irreconcilable differences.
- Perhaps the best way to stop the infighting is to go for a divorce and give the two nations a country each
- Based on the UN's partition plan for Israel/Palestine, this proposal provides territorial contiguity and sea access to both 'red' and 'blue' America
A federal judge ruled that the Trump administration likely violated the reporter's Fifth Amendment rights when it stripped his press credentials earlier this month.
- Acosta will be allowed to return to the White House on Friday.
- The judge described the ruling as narrow, and didn't rule one way or the other on violations of the First Amendment.
- The case is still open, and the administration may choose to appeal the ruling.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.