Some Would Rather Live a Shorter Life than Take a Daily Pill

If there was a daily pill you could take to prevent cardiovascular disease, at no charge, and with no side effects, would you? According to a recent study, one in three people would rather live a shorter life than take a daily pill.

If there was a daily pill you could take to prevent cardiovascular disease, at no charge, and with no side effects, would you? Agata Blaszczak-Boxe from LiveScience writes that, according to a recent study, researchers found that one in three people would rather live a shorter life than take a daily pill.

The study, published in the journal Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcome, surveyed 1,000 people who had a mean age of 50. The participants were asked how much time they would be willing to deduct from their natural lifespan in order to avoid taking a daily pill to prevent cardiovascular disease. The bottom line is some people really don't like taking pills. More than 8 percent were willing to sacrifice two years of their lives and 21 percent would take a week to a year off their lifespan to avoid it. Thankfully, 70 percent responded by saying they wouldn't trade any amount of time.

What's also interesting is that 21 percent of people would be willing to pay $1,000 or more in order to not take a pill, but still enjoy its benefits. However, 43 percent were unwilling to pay any amount of money. The lead author of the study, Dr. Robert Hutchins, a physician at the University of California, was baffled as to why some people were willing to pay or even sacrifice a portion of their life to not take a preventative pill.

"I would have really liked to have gotten to talk to those people, the 'outliers' so to speak, and find out what it was that they thought was so bad about taking a pill daily.”

This study leaves some questions, like what if the hypothetical pill had side effects. Most do, and even fewer people would likely be willing to sacrifice quality of life for a longer stay on this Earth. Perhaps, for some, just having to take a pill affects quality of life.

Read more at LiveScience.

Photo Credit: r. nial bradshaw/Flickr

​There are two kinds of failure – but only one is honorable

Malcolm Gladwell teaches "Get over yourself and get to work" for Big Think Edge.

Big Think Edge
  • Learn to recognize failure and know the big difference between panicking and choking.
  • At Big Think Edge, Malcolm Gladwell teaches how to check your inner critic and get clear on what failure is.
  • Subscribe to Big Think Edge before we launch on March 30 to get 20% off monthly and annual memberships.
Keep reading Show less
Photo by Alina Grubnyak on Unsplash
Mind & Brain

Do human beings have a magnetic sense? Biologists know other animals do. They think it helps creatures including bees, turtles and birds navigate through the world.

Keep reading Show less

Harvard: Men who can do 40 pushups have a 'significantly' lower risk of heart disease

Turns out pushups are more telling than treadmill tests when it comes to cardiovascular health.

Airman 1st Class Justin Baker completes another push-up during the First Sergeants' push-up a-thon June 28, 2011, Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska. Participants were allowed 10 minutes to do as many push-ups as they could during the fundraiser. Airman Baker, a contract specialist assigned to the 354th Contracting Squadron, completed 278 push-ups. (U.S. Air Force photo/Airman 1st Class Janine Thibault)
Surprising Science
  • Men who can perform 40 pushups in one minute are 96 percent less likely to have cardiovascular disease than those who do less than 10.
  • The Harvard study focused on over 1,100 firefighters with a median age of 39.
  • The exact results might not be applicable to men of other age groups or to women, researchers warn.
Keep reading Show less

U.S. reacts to New Zealand's gun ban

On Thursday, New Zealand moved to ban an array of semi-automatic guns and firearms components following a mass shooting that killed 50 people.

(Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images)
Politics & Current Affairs
  • Gun control supporters are pointing to the ban as an example of swift, decisive action that the U.S. desperately needs.
  • Others note the inherent differences between the two nations, arguing that it is a good thing that it is relatively hard to pass such legislation in such a short timeframe.
  • The ban will surely shape future conversations about gun control in the U.S.
Keep reading Show less