Revisiting The "Testosterone Effect" In Voting

Writer Victoria Bassetti discusses how a 2008 study measuring testosterone levels in voters may provide a means towards making the process simpler and easier.

Article written by guest writer Kecia Lynn

What's the Latest Development?

Writer Victoria Bassetti discusses America's lackluster voter participation using a study that suggests hormones may be at work. The study, done in 2008 during the last presidential election, asked participants to chew sugar-free gum right after they voted and again at various intervals after the election. By testing the saliva samples, researchers found that men who had voted for Senator John McCain experienced a large drop in testosterone after hearing of his loss, leaving them feeling "more controlled, submissive, unhappy and unpleasant...[it was] as if they directly engaged head-to-head in a contest for dominance [and lost]." Interestingly, women experienced no change in testosterone levels, and women voters have outnumbered men at every presidential election since 1980.

What's the Big Idea?

Bassetti suggests that examination of the biological factors involved in voting may help towards a redesign of the entire process. In addition to all the other barriers to voting -- among them "the hassles of getting and staying registered, finding the polling station, standing in long lines, deciphering ballots and complying with much contested and confusing ID requirements" -- the possibility that men may become physically turned off by voting is just one extra factor contributing to low turnout, which diminishes the health of American democracy overall.

Photo Credit:

Related Articles
Keep reading Show less

Five foods that increase your psychological well-being

These five main food groups are important for your brain's health and likely to boost the production of feel-good chemicals.

Mind & Brain

We all know eating “healthy” food is good for our physical health and can decrease our risk of developing diabetes, cancer, obesity and heart disease. What is not as well known is that eating healthy food is also good for our mental health and can decrease our risk of depression and anxiety.

Keep reading Show less

For the 99%, the lines are getting blurry

Infographics show the classes and anxieties in the supposedly classless U.S. economy.

What is the middle class now, anyway? (JEWEL SAMAD/AFP/Getty Images)
Politics & Current Affairs

For those of us who follow politics, we’re used to commentators referring to the President’s low approval rating as a surprise given the U.S.'s “booming” economy. This seeming disconnect, however, should really prompt us to reconsider the measurements by which we assess the health of an economy. With a robust U.S. stock market and GDP and low unemployment figures, it’s easy to see why some think all is well. But looking at real U.S. wages, which have remained stagnant—and have, thus, in effect gone down given rising costs from inflation—a very different picture emerges. For the 1%, the economy is booming. For the rest of us, it’s hard to even know where we stand. A recent study by Porch (a home-improvement company) of blue-collar vs. white-collar workers shows how traditional categories are becoming less distinct—the study references "new-collar" workers, who require technical certifications but not college degrees. And a set of recent infographics from CreditLoan capturing the thoughts of America’s middle class as defined by the Pew Research Center shows how confused we are.

Keep reading Show less