New Research Debunks Regifting Taboo
New research suggests that a misunderstanding between givers and receivers of gifts accounts for the taboo against regifting. Givers should encourage receivers to do as they wish.
What's the Latest Development?
New research suggests that a misunderstanding between givers and receivers of gifts accounts for the taboo against regifting. In one experiment, 117 people said they would prefer to regive a gift than throw it away. In another experiment, conducted by researchers from London and Stanford business schools, the taboo against regifting weakened substantially when the idea of a National Regifting Holiday was introduced. "Hypothetical gift recipients who were informed about that holiday altered their judgment of regifting to the point where it matched that of givers."
What's the Big Idea?
The results of the experiments indicate that recipients of gifts believe the original givers are more offended by regifting than they actually are, that givers believe receivers are free to do as they please with the gift, and that receivers feel constrained by the giver's original intentions. Ever the bean-counter, the Wall Street Journal notes that "potentially millions of dollars of value that simply disappears when people bury gifts in the back of their closets." So rather than let (the spirit of giving) gifts go to waste, givers should encourage receivers to do as they please.
Photo credit: Shutterstock.com
Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.
No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.
The Oxfam report prompted Anand Giridharadas to tweet: "Don't be Pinkered into everything's-getting-better complacency."
- A new report by Oxfam argues that wealth inequality is causing poverty and misery around the world.
- In the last year, the world's billionaires saw their wealth increase by 12%, while the poorest 3.8 billion people on the planet lost 11% of their wealth.
- The report prompted Anand Giridharadas to tweet: "Don't be Pinkered into everything's-getting-better complacency." We explain what Steven Pinker's got to do with it.
Evolution doesn't clean up after itself very well.
- An evolutionary biologist got people swapping ideas about our lingering vestigia.
- Basically, this is the stuff that served some evolutionary purpose at some point, but now is kind of, well, extra.
- Here are the six traits that inaugurated the fun.
- Facebook and Google began as companies with supposedly noble purposes.
- Creating a more connected world and indexing the world's information: what could be better than that?
- But pressure to return value to shareholders came at the expense of their own users.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.