Prostate Screening Does More Harm than Good
Screening for prostate cancer does more harm than good confirms a followup study to the eye-opening 2009 report that said longevity benefits associated with screening come at a high risk.
What's the Latest Development?
A follow up study on an eye-opening 2009 report confirms that routine screening for prostate cancer does not save lives. At the very least, researchers said that any longevity benefits were modest and included a significant risk of over diagnosis. "The new study updates the old one, confirming the finding that there's still no mortality difference between the screened and non-screened groups, even after the roughly 75,000 men in the study have been followed for 13 years."
What's the Big Idea?
Clearly there will be some cases where screening for prostate cancer will be beneficial but when weighing the risks of screening versus not screening over an entire population, researchers have concluded that risks of screening, including impotence and incontinence, are too high given the relative unreliability of prostate screening technology. For example, "current screening techniques cannot distinguish well between prostate cancers that will soon be dangerous and those that will not."
Photo credit: shutterstock.com
Are university safe spaces killing intellectual growth?
Our experience of time may be blinding us to its true nature, say scientists.
- Time may not be passing at all, says the Block Universe Theory.
- Time travel may be possible.
- Your perception of time is likely relative to you and limited.
From questionable shipwrecks to outright attacks, they clearly don't want to be bothered.
- Many have tried to contact the Sentinelese, to write about them, or otherwise.
- But the inhabitants of the 23 square mile island in the Bay of Bengal don't want anything to do with the outside world.
- Their numbers are unknown, but either 40 or 500 remain.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.