Political Correctness Fosters Better Creative Teamwork
Knowing what is acceptable to say creates predictability, and predictability frees group members from worry of possibly offending those around them.
Being politically correct helps teams of mixed genders arrive at more creative solutions. Knowing what is acceptable to say creates predictability, and predictability frees group members from worry of possibly offending those around them.
A group of researchers at Cornell University arrived at these conclusions after asking 483 students of both genders to solve an open-ended problem (which encourages creative solutions): What kind of business should be built on an empty lot?
"The groups that were politically correct — for instance, who avoided sexist language — generated a greater number of ideas, and more novel ideas, than groups operating without the norm."
Researchers found that using the term "politically correct" was important when it came to creating a safe atmosphere for sharing ideas. Instructing teams to be "polite" or "inoffensive" brought to surface differences of opinion about what those words mean. But political correctness seems to have a more commonly understood meaning.
Interestingly, same-sex groups were less creative when instructed to be politically correct. Researchers concluded that among people who are already on the same page, the burden of being politically correct placed an unnecessary mental strain on the creative process.
In his Big Think interview, Jason Friedman gives more tips about creating a workplace environment that enables creativity and promotes the free (but not unstructured) flow of ideas:
Read more at Ozy
Photo credit: Shutterstock
How a cataclysm worse than what killed the dinosaurs destroyed 90 percent of all life on Earth.
While the demise of the dinosaurs gets more attention as far as mass extinctions go, an even more disastrous event called "the Great Dying” or the “End-Permian Extinction” happened on Earth prior to that. Now scientists discovered how this cataclysm, which took place about 250 million years ago, managed to kill off more than 90 percent of all life on the planet.
A new study discovers the “liking gap” — the difference between how we view others we’re meeting for the first time, and the way we think they’re seeing us.
We tend to be defensive socially. When we meet new people, we’re often concerned with how we’re coming off. Our anxiety causes us to be so concerned with the impression we’re creating that we fail to notice that the same is true of the other person as well. A new study led by Erica J. Boothby, published on September 5 in Psychological Science, reveals how people tend to like us more in first encounters than we’d ever suspect.
Using advanced laser technology, scientists at NASA will track global changes in ice with greater accuracy.
Leaving from Vandenberg Air Force base in California this coming Saturday, at 8:46 a.m. ET, the Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite-2 — or, the "ICESat-2" — is perched atop a United Launch Alliance Delta II rocket, and when it assumes its orbit, it will study ice layers at Earth's poles, using its only payload, the Advance Topographic Laser Altimeter System (ATLAS).
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.