Pew Report: Millennials Are Bigger Bookworms Than Their Elders

A Pew Research report has found people under 30 are reading more than people over 30. Is Harry Potter to thank?

It turns out that Millennials are the most well-read generation we've seen in quite a while. This is according to an extensive Pew Research report on younger Americans and libraries, released earlier this week. Carolyn Kellogg of The Los Angeles Times has the scoop:


"According to the report, 88% of Americans 16 to 29 years old have read at least one book in the past year, compared with 79% of people 30 and older.

And millennials who read aren't just picking up one book. 'Among younger Americans who did read at least one book, the median or typical number read in the past year was 10,' the report adds.

About 43% of millennials read books on a daily basis; that's a figure comparable to older adults."

While Pew doesn't seek to find out exactly why Millennials read more, one can assume that the generation's affinity for technology (and therefore Amazon, Audible, and library websites) plays a role. You can also point to the influence of programs such as Reading Rainbow, the increased emphasis on making reading fun in public schools, and the popularity of the Harry Potter series, which got a lot of people under 30 excited about books at a young age.

As mentioned, the main focus of the report is to map out how Americans under 30 engage with libraries. While it was found that Millennials use their local libraries at about the same rate as the general population, they tend to value them less. From Pew:

"Younger Americans are among the least likely to say that libraries are important. Some 19% of those under 30 say their library’s closing would have a major impact on them and their family, compared with 32% of older adults, and 51% of younger Americans say it would have a major impact on their community, compared with 67% of those 30 and older."

Read more at The Los Angeles Times and check out the entire report at Pew.

Photo credit: suravid / Shutterstock

Should you defend the free speech rights of neo-Nazis?

Former president of the ACLU Nadine Strossen discusses whether our society should always defend free speech rights, even for groups who would oppose such rights.

Sponsored by Charles Koch Foundation
  • Former ACLU president Nadine Strossen understands that protecting free speech rights isn't always a straightforward proposition.
  • In this video, Strossen describes the reasoning behind why the ACLU defended the free speech rights of neo-Nazis in Skokie, Illinois, 1977.
  • The opinions expressed in this video do not necessarily reflect the views of the Charles Koch Foundation, which encourages the expression of diverse viewpoints within a culture of civil discourse and mutual respect.
Keep reading Show less

Harness the Power of Calm

Tap into the "Rest and Digest" System to Achieve Your Goals

Big Think Edge
  • In the fast-paced workplaces and productivity-focused societies many of us inhabit today, it is easy to burnout.
  • Emma Seppälä, a Stanford researcher on human happiness, recommends tapping into the parasympathetic nervous system instead—"rest and digest"rather than "fight or flight."
  • Aiming for energy management rather than time management will give you the resilience you need to excel at the things that really matter in your life and career, rather than living "mostly off" by attempting to seem "always on."

Apple co-founder says we should all ditch Facebook — permanently

Steve Wozniak doesn't know if his phone is listening, but he's minimizing risks.

Photo by Bryan Steffy/Getty Images
Technology & Innovation
  • Steve Wozniak didn't hold back his feelings about the social media giant when stopped at an airport.
  • The Apple co-founder admitted that devices spying on his conversations is worrisome.
  • Wozniak deleted his Facebook account last year, recommending that "most people" should do the same.
Keep reading Show less

Where the evidence of fake news is really hiding

When it comes to sniffing out whether a source is credible or not, even journalists can sometimes take the wrong approach.

Sponsored by Charles Koch Foundation
  • We all think that we're competent consumers of news media, but the research shows that even journalists struggle with identifying fact from fiction.
  • When judging whether a piece of media is true or not, most of us focus too much on the source itself. Knowledge has a context, and it's important to look at that context when trying to validate a source.
  • The opinions expressed in this video do not necessarily reflect the views of the Charles Koch Foundation, which encourages the expression of diverse viewpoints within a culture of civil discourse and mutual respect.
Keep reading Show less