Personal Character Is a Myth
In a constantly changing world, it sometimes seems that our only anchor is personal character but put it to the test and this supposedly durable good begins to look quite flimsy.
What's the Latest Development?
Associate psychology professor at Northeastern University, David DeSteno has found that getting people to do things "out of character" is remarkably easy. In an experiment that measured how individuals reacted to being excluded from a group, DeSteno found that feelings of jealousy, empathy, vindictiveness, and hypocrisy were easy to tease out, even if those dispositions were inconsistent with how people thought of themselves. "Intention is only a very small part of character," says DeSteno. "We have to understand that behaviors for better or for ill, vice or virtue, aren't always a function of intention or our ability to control them. You have to understand how the system works to gain control of it."
What's the Big Idea?
At stake in DeSteno's research is the very idea that an individual has a stable character, an idea that much of our moral reasoning depends on. If questions of agency become less important—if we recognize that how people act is determined far more by circumstance than we had originally thought—assigning praise or blame to an action becomes much more difficult. While we need not go so far as to say the likes of Hitler and bin Laden were beyond self control, reevaluating what personal character means may help us to see that the dilemmas faced by the movers of history are the same ones many of us face daily on a smaller scale. What ultimately determines character, says DeSteno, is not choosing between good and bad, but between short-term and long-term gain.
Former president of the ACLU Nadine Strossen discusses whether our society should always defend free speech rights, even for groups who would oppose such rights.
- Former ACLU president Nadine Strossen understands that protecting free speech rights isn't always a straightforward proposition.
- In this video, Strossen describes the reasoning behind why the ACLU defended the free speech rights of neo-Nazis in Skokie, Illinois, 1977.
- The opinions expressed in this video do not necessarily reflect the views of the Charles Koch Foundation, which encourages the expression of diverse viewpoints within a culture of civil discourse and mutual respect.
Want to be smarter than you were yesterday? Learn to have better conversations using these 3 design principles.
- What is a great conversation? They are the ones that leave us feeling smarter or more curious, with a sense that we have discovered something, understood something about another person, or have been challenged.
- There are 3 design principles that lead to great conversations: humility, critical thinking, and sympathetic listening.
- Critical thinking is the celebrated cornerstone of liberalism, but next time you're in a challenging and rewarding conversation, try to engage sympathetic listening too. Understanding why another intelligent person holds ideas that are at odds with your own is often more enlightening than merely hunting for logic errors.
A consortium of scientists and engineers have proposed that the U.S. and Mexico build a series of guarded solar, wind, natural gas and desalination facilities along the entirety of the border.
- The proposal was recently presented to several U.S. members of Congress.
- The plan still calls for border security, considering all of the facilities along the border would be guarded and connected by physical barriers.
- It's undoubtedly an expensive and complicated proposal, but the team argues that border regions are ideal spots for wind and solar energy, and that they could use the jobs and fresh water the energy park would create.
The reason one diet does not suit all may be found in our guts.