PETA Postmortem: Autism/Milk Debacle Erases Any Credibility the Organization Had

PETA ruffled feathers last month with a misleading ad campaign that suggested consumption of dairy products led to autism. The organization, already widely derided for its sensationalism, has an uphill road to climb if it ever wants to be taken seriously again.

What's the Latest?

This one's about a month old but the fallout is still fresh enough for a postmortem.

In a campaign that reeked of the ignorance permeating the devastating anti-vaccination movement, PETA last month released ads linking consumption of dairy products to autism. The "Got Autism?" campaign cited a 2002 study by Norwegian scientists who found that autistic children put on a strict anti-dairy diet exhibited fewer traits of the disorder. Even though the PETA release admitted that more research would be necessary to determine if a true link exists, that didn't stop the organization from launching what is essentially a farcically hyperbolic campaign dependent more on scare tactics than science.

The anti-PETA response was deafening. Publications and outlets that attacked the campaign included: Time, Forbes, i09, The Telegraph, The Wire, The Sydney Morning Herald, and so, so many others.

What's the Big Idea?

Kent Sepkowitz of the Daily Beast offered one of the more measured, thoughtful responses:

The drive to find the cause and cure of autism rivals the urgency and poignancy to find the cause and cure of cancer. And so, as with cancer, anything with a hint of possible truth is grabbed and trumpeted as the next big thing...

Not only are they putting early maybe-science out there as fact and giving unwarranted hope to countless parents, but they are interfering with the way science happens. 

While PETA's tactics are often called out for being over-the-top, Sepkowitz focuses much of his ire on the organization's goals for the campaign. PETA ran "Got Autism?" not to assist in the fight against the disorder but rather to further their own agenda. That they tapped into the fear culture surrounding autism to do so was both irresponsible and reprehensible. The campaign was fear-mongering, not activism.

What's somewhat disappointing is that PETA's brand is strong enough that the organization could, with a better approach and vision, bring about positive change. They've shown results in the past; their work helped curb the fur market in the late 80s (and one can argue their current anti-fur campaigns are still effective). But PETA's reliance on shock tactics and sensationalism has caused such a hearty backlash that any good they could potentially do will always be shrouded in a cloud of distrust.

Read on at The Daily Beast

Photo credit: Sea Wave / Shutterstock

LinkedIn meets Tinder in this mindful networking app

Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.

Getty Images
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.

No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.

Keep reading Show less

4 reasons Martin Luther King, Jr. fought for universal basic income

In his final years, Martin Luther King, Jr. become increasingly focused on the problem of poverty in America.

(Photo by J. Wilds/Keystone/Getty Images)
Politics & Current Affairs
  • Despite being widely known for his leadership role in the American civil rights movement, Martin Luther King, Jr. also played a central role in organizing the Poor People's Campaign of 1968.
  • The campaign was one of the first to demand a guaranteed income for all poor families in America.
  • Today, the idea of a universal basic income is increasingly popular, and King's arguments in support of the policy still make a good case some 50 years later.
Keep reading Show less

Why avoiding logical fallacies is an everyday superpower

10 of the most sandbagging, red-herring, and effective logical fallacies.

Photo credit: Miguel Henriques on Unsplash
Personal Growth
  • Many an otherwise-worthwhile argument has been derailed by logical fallacies.
  • Sometimes these fallacies are deliberate tricks, and sometimes just bad reasoning.
  • Avoiding these traps makes disgreeing so much better.
Keep reading Show less

Why I wear my life on my skin

For Damien Echols, tattoos are part of his existential armor.

  • In prison Damien Echols was known by his number SK931, not his name, and had his hair sheared off. Stripped of his identity, the only thing he had left was his skin.
  • This is why he began tattooing things that are meaningful to him — to carry a "suit of armor" made up the images of the people and objects that have significance to him, from his friends to talismans.
  • Echols believes that all places are imbued with divinity: "If you interact with New York City as if there's an intelligence behind... then it will behave towards you the same way."
Keep reading Show less