Larry Summers: The Fed Needs to Keep Interest Rates Where They Are

Leaders at the Federal Reserve will meet later this month to discuss potential rate hikes that have most experts and economists split.

Economist and Big Think expert Larry Summers took to his personal blog today to argue that a potential Federal Reserve interest rate hike would be a major mistake.

If you haven't been following the high-speed dynamic excitement of Federal Reserve rate debates, I can hardly blame you. Put simply, the Fed has kept interest rates at near all-time lows for the greater part of a decade, mostly to nurture a slow-rebounding economy. Now, with last month's Wall Street scare casting a shadow on an uncertain future, it appears somewhat likely that Fed Chair Janet Yellen and her pals will trigger a series of rate increases when they meet to talk policy later this month.

Summers presents five key points in support of his idea, among them being that the American and world economies have slowed their growth.

The Fed has felt pressure for years from plenty of outlets and economists who argue that rate hikes will spur productivity and protect the economy should another recession materialize in the coming year. The USA Today editorial board, for example, argued that the American economy is finally durable enough to sustain a rate increase; thus, the era of unprecedented low rates (which contributed, in part, to the housing bubble) ought to end. 

But Summers, who many thought a few years ago might end up with the job that eventually went to Yellen, takes the opposite opinion. He presents five key points in support of his idea, among them being that the American and world economies have slowed their growth, thus lowering inflationary risks. He also disagrees that the American economy is ready for such change:

Summers accuses those at the Fed who support rate increases of working to elevate their credibility "over responding to clear realities." Basically he wants them not to give into outside pressure to take action just because it looks like the right thing to do. The actual right thing to do, he says, is much less flashy: pretty much nothing. According to Summers, standing pat gives the Fed its best chance "to support a fully employed American economy achieving its inflation target with stable financial conditions."

As far as government and extra-government institutions go, the Fed is about as esoteric as they come. Summers does well to make his arguments as straightforward and simple as possible. He concludes with the belief that risks and fears of collapse in 2015 and 2016 are overblown and that we're in a decent enough position now to continue on a course toward stability. But should those fears be founded, the Fed's tinkering could result in "catastrophic error."


Summers offered some prognostications on the oil market in a recent Big Think interview. Here's why prices should stay relatively low compared to where they once were:

'Upstreamism': Your zip code affects your health as much as genetics

Upstreamism advocate Rishi Manchanda calls us to understand health not as a "personal responsibility" but a "common good."

Sponsored by Northwell Health
  • Upstreamism tasks health care professionals to combat unhealthy social and cultural influences that exist outside — or upstream — of medical facilities.
  • Patients from low-income neighborhoods are most at risk of negative health impacts.
  • Thankfully, health care professionals are not alone. Upstreamism is increasingly part of our cultural consciousness.
Keep reading Show less

Cornell engineers create artificial material with 3 key traits of life

An innovation may lead to lifelike self-reproducing and evolving machines.

Shogo Hamada/Cornell University
Surprising Science
  • Scientists at Cornell University devise a material with 3 key traits of life.
  • The goal for the researchers is not to create life but lifelike machines.
  • The researchers were able to program metabolism into the material's DNA.
Keep reading Show less

After death, you’re aware that you’ve died, say scientists

Some evidence attributes a certain neurological phenomenon to a near death experience.

Credit: Petr Kratochvil.
Surprising Science

Time of death is considered when a person has gone into cardiac arrest. This is the cessation of the electrical impulse that drive the heartbeat. As a result, the heart locks up. The moment the heart stops is considered time of death. But does death overtake our mind immediately afterward or does it slowly creep in?

Keep reading Show less
  • A huge segment of America's population — the Baby Boom generation — is aging and will live longer than any American generation in history.
  • The story we read about in the news? Their drain on social services like Social Security and Medicare.
  • But increased longevity is a cause for celebration, says Ashton Applewhite, not doom and gloom.