Is the Tide of Public Opinion Turning Against Walmart?
Corporations have become the arbiters of social well-being. Some, like Walmart, abuse the system, relying on government subsidies like food stamps to provide for their employees.
What's the Latest?
Our do-nothing Congress continues to refuse policy measures aimed at creating a more equitable society. Raising minimum wage? Won't even discuss it. Student loan burdens? Tough. Environmental protection? Yawn. Corporations have become the arbiters of social well-being. Some, like Walmart, abuse the system, relying on government subsidies like food stamps to provide for their employees. "By one measure...the average Walmart superstore cost taxpayers $904,000 a year in various subsidies, or more than $5,000 per employee." For the upper crust at Walmart, life is grand. Last year the company made $17 billion in profits and executives took eight-figure salaries.
What's the Big Idea?
Legislative obstructionism has brought about a "free market" which is more active in some areas of society than government. While companies like Starbucks display their conscience in press releases, others maintain the dangerous illusion that as a business, their only responsibility is to turn a profit. Even so, Walmart could do better for its 1.4 million workers without diminishing its stock value. "Writing in Fortune.com, Stephen Gandel concluded that Walmart could give workers a 50 percent raise without hurting shareholder value." And Bill Gross, the founder of the investment firm PIMCO, recently said that "labor and capital have to share in the rewards of a productive economy, and for the last 25 years labor has gotten the short end of the stick."
Read more at the New York Times
Photo credit: Susan Law Cain/Shutterstock
- Patients from low-income neighborhoods are most at risk of negative health impacts.
- But increased longevity is a cause for celebration, says Ashton Applewhite, not doom and gloom.
Some evidence attributes a certain neurological phenomenon to a near death experience.
- The research raises many ethical questions and puts to the test our current understanding of death.
What's dead may never die, it seems
The researchers did not hail from House Greyjoy — "What is dead may never die" — but came largely from the Yale School of Medicine. They connected 32 pig brains to a system called BrainEx. BrainEx is an artificial perfusion system — that is, a system that takes over the functions normally regulated by the organ. The pigs had been killed four hours earlier at a U.S. Department of Agriculture slaughterhouse; their brains completely removed from the skulls.
An ethical gray matter
The dilemma is unprecedented.
Setting new boundaries
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.