Eliminating Extreme Poverty by 2030 Will Require a Herculean Effort

The United Nations is expected to adopt the World Bank's goal of eliminating extreme poverty by 2030. Whether that goal is feasible depends on just how many resources one expects will be put to use in the effort.

As Linda Yueh writes over at the BBC, the UN is expected later this year to adopt the World Bank's ambitious goal of eliminating what's called "extreme poverty" by 2030. Yueh asks a very reasonable question: Is this a feasible goal? Could the lowest extremes of world poverty vanish in as little as 15 years' time? She cites some optimistic numbers related to the precipitous drop in world poverty rates over the past generation, but notes that much of this progress is centralized in East Asia, where China has made major strides in lowering the floor for its many citizens:

"In 1990, more than one-third (36%) of the world's population lived in abject poverty. That was halved to 18% in 2010."

So what would it take to reduce that 18% figure to 3% (there will always be what experts refer to as "frictional poverty")? Well, first of all, a herculean effort in Sub-Saharan Africa, a region where the number of impoverished people has incongruously risen over the past three decades:

"Even though the percentage of the African population living in extreme poverty is slightly lower than in 1981 — population growth means that the number of people has actually doubled.

They account for more than one-third of the poor in the world, despite Africa making up just 11% of the global population."

Despite the gargantuan scale, Yueh explains that the World Bank is confident it can accomplish its goals. It's just -- as mentioned -- going to take a heck of lot of work:

"The World Bank projects that it's possible to end extreme poverty by 2030. But, it would take a heroic effort. The number of people in poverty will have to decrease by 50 million each year. That is the equivalent of about a million people each week for the next 15 years."

A major cog in this machine is the achievement of political and social stability in countries that have been plagued with recent strife. Then private investment and development must be brought in to grow local economies and achieve stability. Finally, policies that encourage efficiency in matters of agriculture, education, and employment could make major differences for individual countries. 

Below, Big Think expert Julie Sunderland explains how the Gates Foundation merges the efforts of both the private and public sectors to make the world a better place:

Read more at BBC.

Photo credit: africa924 / Shutterstock

NASA astronomer Michelle Thaller on ​the multiple dimensions of space and human sexuality

Science and the squishiness of the human mind. The joys of wearing whatever the hell you want, and so much more.

Think Again Podcasts
  • Why can't we have a human-sized cat tree?
  • What would happen if you got a spoonful of a neutron star?
  • Why do we insist on dividing our wonderfully complex selves into boring little boxes
Keep reading Show less

How to split the USA into two countries: Red and Blue

Progressive America would be half as big, but twice as populated as its conservative twin.

Image: Dicken Schrader
Strange Maps
  • America's two political tribes have consolidated into 'red' and 'blue' nations, with seemingly irreconcilable differences.
  • Perhaps the best way to stop the infighting is to go for a divorce and give the two nations a country each
  • Based on the UN's partition plan for Israel/Palestine, this proposal provides territorial contiguity and sea access to both 'red' and 'blue' America
Keep reading Show less

Ideology drives us apart. Neuroscience can bring us back together.

A guide to making difficult conversations possible—and peaceful—in an increasingly polarized nation.

  • How can we reach out to people on the other side of the divide? Get to know the other person as a human being before you get to know them as a set of tribal political beliefs, says Sarah Ruger. Don't launch straight into the difficult topics—connect on a more basic level first.
  • To bond, use icebreakers backed by neuroscience and psychology: Share a meal, watch some comedy, see awe-inspiring art, go on a tough hike together—sharing tribulation helps break down some of the mental barriers we have between us. Then, get down to talking, putting your humanity before your ideology.
  • The Charles Koch Foundation is committed to understanding what drives intolerance and the best ways to cure it. The foundation supports interdisciplinary research to overcome intolerance, new models for peaceful interactions, and experiments that can heal fractured communities. For more information, visit charleskochfoundation.org/courageous-collaborations.