Interested in the Arts? You're Probably More Altruistic.
Researchers at the University of Illinois at Chicago have linked artistic appreciation, particularly engaging as an audience, with a greater willingness to contribute to society.
What's the Latest Development?
People who sing, dance, draw and act—and particularly those who watch others do so—tend to be more altruistic and more willing to contribute to society, says a study by researchers at the University of Illinois at Chicago. Kelly LeRoux, who led the study, described the researchers' methods: "We correlated survey responses to arts-related questions to responses on altruistic actions—like donating blood, donating money, giving directions, or doing favors for a neighbor—that place the interests of others over the interests of self."
What's the Big Idea?
"Even after controlling for age, race and education," said LeRoux, "we found that participation in the arts, especially as audience, predicted civic engagement, tolerance and altruism." The arts, always in want of support when appearing before budget-cutting lawmakers, may have found a new ally in LeRoux's study: "If policymakers are concerned about a decline in community life, the arts shouldn't be disregarded as a means to promote an active citizenry," LeRoux said. "Our positive findings could strengthen the case for government support for the arts."
Photo credit: Shutterstock.com
The ability to speak clearly, succinctly, and powerfully is easier than you think
The ability to communicate effectively can make or break a person's assessment of your intelligence, competence, and authenticity.
The results come from a 15-year study that used ultrasound scans to track blood vessels in middle-aged adults starting in 2002.
- The study measured the stiffness of blood vessels in middle-aged patients over time.
- Stiff blood vessels can lead to the destruction of delicate blood vessels in the brain, which can contribute to cognitive decline.
- The scans could someday become a widely used tool to identify people at high risk of developing dementia and Alzheimer's.
The lawsuit claims the administration violated the First Amendment when it revoked the press credentials of reporter Jim Acosta.
- CNN reporter Jim Acosta's press credentials were revoked following a heated exchange with President Donald Trump on November 8.
- The network filed a lawsuit against the administration on Tuesday, claiming the administration has violated multiple amendments.
- The White House may only revoke the press credentials of journalists for "compelling reasons," not for reasons involving content.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.