If Grandma Won't Wear A Tracking Device, Maybe Her Dog Will
Two Newcastle University researchers have developed a canine version of a device that tracks its wearer's behaviors. They theorize that changes in those behaviors could indicate a problem at home with the dog's owner.
Kecia Lynn has worked as a technical writer, editor, software developer, arts administrator, summer camp director, and television host. A graduate of Case Western Reserve University and the Iowa Writers' Workshop, she is currently living in Iowa City and working on her first novel.
What's the Latest Development?
Two Newcastle University researchers have contributed to the quantified self movement in a way that fans of "Lassie" would appreciate: Electrical engineer Dr. Cassim Ladha and computer scientist Nils Hammerla have designed a special kind of dog collar that identifies and tracks 17 unique behaviors "including chewing, peeing, shivering, and sniffing." They presented the device at last month's UbiComp conference.
What's the Big Idea?
The device follows up on the researchers' past work with sensor-based technology and vulnerable populations such as those living with Parkinson's disease or in assisted care. To that end, the collar is less about tracking the dog and more about tracking its owner, particularly if they are elderly and not keen on wearing a device themselves. Ladha and Hammerla say that in theory, changes in certain dog behaviors, such as feeding times, could signal that the human is having problems. "Because we’re closely linked to dogs in a social aspect...there’s a close companionship bond there. That’s what makes this system possible," says Ladha. Despite this, if a person really doesn't want to be tracked -- even through a surrogate -- they can always remove the collar.
Photo Credit: Shutterstock.com
New research links urban planning and political polarization.
- Canadian researchers find that excessive reliance on cars changes political views.
- Decades of car-centric urban planning normalized unsustainable lifestyles.
- People who prefer personal comfort elect politicians who represent such views.
Progressive America would be half as big, but twice as populated as its conservative twin.
- America's two political tribes have consolidated into 'red' and 'blue' nations, with seemingly irreconcilable differences.
- Perhaps the best way to stop the infighting is to go for a divorce and give the two nations a country each
- Based on the UN's partition plan for Israel/Palestine, this proposal provides territorial contiguity and sea access to both 'red' and 'blue' America
Science and the squishiness of the human mind. The joys of wearing whatever the hell you want, and so much more.
- Why can't we have a human-sized cat tree?
- What would happen if you got a spoonful of a neutron star?
- Why do we insist on dividing our wonderfully complex selves into boring little boxes
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.