Stung by Financial Crisis, Iceland Wants Soviet-Style Banking
The Icelandic government is considering a radical financial shift that would effectively end banking as we know it.
The exploding volcano above is an apt visual metaphor for what Iceland's economy looked like in the early years of last decade's world financial crisis. Flirting with a total and complete economic meltdown, perhaps even teetering on the edge of becoming a failed state, Iceland mounted an incredible turnaround thanks to several key measures. Paramount was the decision to let the country's banks collapse like a house in a Buster Keaton movie. It's safe to say that the Icelandic people have no problem forcing banks to bend to their will.
A radical plan currently brewing in Iceland's government could lead to more of the same.
As reported by Agence France-Presse and Max Ehrenfreund of the Washington Post, Iceland's prime minister Sigmundur Davíð Gunnlaugsson has requested a report by parliamentarian Frosti Sigurjónsson detailing why the government should disallow banks to create money. Ehrenfreund explains:
"It sounds strange to say it, but creating money is indeed something that banks do all the time. Say you take out a loan to start a business from your bank. You write checks to your workers and your rent and you buy goods wholesale. Eventually, your suppliers and employees deposit that money at their banks, which can in turn make new loans. One of those banks might extend a mortgage to help someone buy a house, and the cycle repeats.
As the checks change hands, the total amount of money out there actually multiplies with each cycle. Even though the homeowner has paid for the house she's now living in, your employee can still withdraw her cash from her bank account. And although you have money to pay all your expenses at your business, your bank's depositors can still take out their money as well. Money has been created."
The current Icelandic government is not a big fan of this! Ehrenfreund discusses the contents of the Sigurjónsson report, which argues that the above system is unsustainable. Instead, what's prescribed is a "sovereign money" system featuring a more centralized banking entity in which the government "would essentially run checking and savings accounts."
While sovereign money systems aren't exactly a new development, a change of this degree would certainly be unprecedented in modern times. Ehrenfreund includes several perspectives that vary from eagerly supportive of the Sigurjónsson plan to vehemently opposed (calling it "Soviet-style"). Check out the piece (linked below) for more info on this interesting idea.
Read more at the Washington Post.
President of Iceland Ólafur Ragnar Grímsson explains how the island nation relied on the potent power of democracy to solve major problems related to economic collapse during the financial crisis.
International poker champion Liv Boeree teaches decision-making for Big Think Edge.
One way to limit clutter is by being mindful of your spending.
- Overbuyers are people who love to buy — they stockpile things as a result. These are individuals who are prone to run out of space in trying to store their stuff and they may even lose track of what — and how much of what — they have.
- One way overbuyers can limit their waste, both money and space wise, is by storing items at the store, and then buy them when they really need them.
- Underbuyers tend to go to extraordinary lengths to not buy things. They save money and do fewer errands, however, they often make do with shabby personal items. They may also, when they finally decide to go out to buy a product, go without entirely because the item may no longer be available.
An MIT study predicts when artificial intelligence will take over for humans in different occupations.
While technology develops at exponential speed, transforming how we go about our everyday tasks and extending our lives, it also offers much to worry about. In particular, many top minds think that automation will cost humans their employment, with up to 47% of all jobs gone in the next 25 years. And chances are, this number could be even higher and the massive job loss will come earlier.
A new study has investigated who watched the ISIS beheading videos, why, and what effect it had on them
This is the first study to explore not only what percentage of people in the general population choose to watch videos of graphic real-life violence, but also why.
In the summer of 2014, two videos were released that shocked the world. They showed the beheadings, by ISIS, of two American journalists – first, James Foley and then Steven Sotloff. Though the videos were widely discussed on TV, print and online news, most outlets did not show the full footage. However, it was not difficult to find links to the videos online.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.