How Working Through Lunch Can Be Better For You

So long as you're not being pressured to do it, staying at your desk can result in less fatigue than previously expected, says a new study.

What's the Latest Development?


A study to be published in a forthcoming issue of Academy of Management Journal challenges commonly held notions about the value of the lunch break. Researchers asked employees to describe what they did during their lunch breaks and then asked their co-workers to determine how tired the participants appeared at the end of the day. Participants seemed more fatigued regardless of whether they worked through lunch or socialized with co-workers, but the effects were lessened if they believed they had control over whether to work through lunch, whether to socialize, and with whom they could socialize.

What's the Big Idea?

Lunches that include "people who you can't necessarily kick back and be yourself with" and/or involve work-related conversations can be more stressful than simply staying at one's desk. However, working through lunch is only less stressful if it's by choice, says study co-author and University of Toronto professor John Trougakos: "The autonomy aspect helps to offset what we had traditionally thought was not a good way to spend break time." Offering opportunities for relaxation -- in whatever form the employee thinks best -- can lead to increased effectiveness and productivity.

Photo Credit: Shutterstock.com

Read it at Business News Daily

Compelling speakers do these 4 things every single time

The ability to speak clearly, succinctly, and powerfully is easier than you think

Former U.S. President Barack Obama speaks during a Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee rally at the Anaheim Convention Center on September 8, 2018 in Anaheim, California. (Photo by Barbara Davidson/Getty Images)
Personal Growth

The ability to communicate effectively can make or break a person's assessment of your intelligence, competence, and authenticity.

Keep reading Show less

Antimicrobial resistance is a growing threat to good health and well-being

Antimicrobial resistance is growing worldwide, rendering many "work horse" medicines ineffective. Without intervention, drug-resistant pathogens could lead to millions of deaths by 2050. Thankfully, companies like Pfizer are taking action.

Image courtesy of Pfizer.
Sponsored
  • Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens are one of the largest threats to global health today.
  • As we get older, our immune systems age, increasing our risk of life threatening infections. Without reliable antibiotics, life expectancy could decline for the first time in modern history.
  • If antibiotics become ineffective, common infections could result in hospitalization or even death. Life-saving interventions like cancer treatments and organ transplantation would become more difficult, more often resulting in death. Routine procedures would become hard to perform.
  • Without intervention, resistant pathogens could result in 10 million annual deaths by 2050.
  • By taking a multi-faceted approach—inclusive of adherence to good stewardship, surveillance and responsible manufacturing practices, as well as an emphasis on prevention and treatment—companies like Pfizer are fighting to help curb the spread.
Keep reading Show less

We are heading for a New Cretaceous, not for a new normal

The climate change we're witnessing is more dramatic than we might think.

Image credit: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center from Greenbelt, MD, USA
Surprising Science

A lazy buzz phrase – 'Is this the new normal?' – has been doing the rounds as extreme climate events have been piling up over the past year. To which the riposte should be: it's worse than that – we're on the road to even more frequent, more extreme events than we saw this year.

Keep reading Show less