How to outsmart a lie detector test

Beating a polygraph test is as simple as understanding its psychological facets and turning them in your favor.

How to outsmart a lie detector test

A polygraph machine is not a magical device. It can't read your mind; it has no concept of truth. The polygraph test is ostensibly designed to identify liars from truth-tellers, but its weaknesses make it like any other test in that it can be beaten, given the right kind of studying. To outsmart a lie detector you must first understand its psychological facets and then turn them in your favor. Malia Wollan writes this in today's The New York Times:

The first step is not to be intimidated. Most tests include two types of questions: relevant ones about a specific incident ('Did you leak classified information to The New York Times?') and broader so-called control questions ('Have you ever lied to anyone who trusted you?'). The test assumes that an innocent person telling the truth will have a stronger reaction to the control questions than to the relevant ones.

The trick is to learn how to conjure physical reactions that go against the test's expectations. Practice calming yourself when asked relevant questions — think of the beach or the mountains. Keep cool under pressure and the physiological readers won't know any better. Then practice frightening yourself when asked a control question. Imagine horrific images or distressing memories that will cause your heart rate to rise.

Many experts, ranging from the American Psychological Association to the United States Supreme Court, are unconvinced of the polygraph's supposed veracity. Doug Williams, a former police detective at the heart of Wollan's piece, calls the lie detector test "[an] insidious Orwellian instrument of torture," which I suppose means he's not a very big fan.

What's clear is that the polygraph isn't entirely reliable, especially if the test-taker knows how to crack it. Like you do, now. So yes, it's possible to beat the lie detector — not that we necessarily endorse the idea of trying to, though.

Read more at the New York Times.

In the following Floating University video, Harvard professor and Big Think expert Steven Pinker explains how the contents and manner of speech offer a glimpse into the shape of our consciousness.

A Magnetotail Around Mars Would Cause the Planet to Terraform Itself

Imagine the birth of an entirely new ocean on the Martian surface. 

 

Artist rendition of a terraformed Mars. Flickr.
Technology & Innovation

There are lots of arguments for exploring space and colonizing other planets. Exploration is a natural part of our species. The knowledge we gain is bound to propel our scientific understanding and capabilities. And admittedly, there are plenty of commercial reasons too. Plus, sooner or later, the Earth is going to die out. To survive, we’ll have to become an interplanetary species.

Keep reading Show less

The future of humanity: can we avert disaster?

Climate change and artificial intelligence pose substantial — and possibly existential — problems for humanity to solve. Can we?

Credit: stokkete / 223237936 via Adobe Stock
13-8
  • Just by living our day-to-day lives, we are walking into a disaster.
  • Can humanity wake up to avert disaster?
  • Perhaps COVID was the wake-up call we all needed.
Keep reading Show less

Genetics of unexplained sudden cardiac arrest

New research shines a light on the genetics of sudden cardiac deaths.

Photo: Pixel-Shot / Adobe Stock
Surprising Science
  • Soccer player Christian Eriksen of Denmark recently collapsed on the field from a cardiac arrest. Thankfully, he survived.
  • A new study examined the genetics underlying unexplained sudden cardiac death.
  • About 20 percent of these unexplained deaths are likely due to genetics.
Keep reading Show less
Technology & Innovation

Finally, a scientific cure for the hiccups

A new device cured the hiccups 92 percent of the time in a recent study involving more than 200 participants.

Quantcast