How to Outsmart a Lie Detector Test
Beating a polygraph test is as simple as understanding its psychological facets and turning them in your favor.
A polygraph machine is not a magical device. It can't read your mind; it has no concept of truth. The polygraph test is ostensibly designed to identify liars from truth-tellers, but its weaknesses make it like any other test in that it can be beaten, given the right kind of studying. To outsmart a lie detector you must first understand its psychological facets and then turn them in your favor. Malia Wollan writes this in today's The New York Times:
"The first step is not to be intimidated. Most tests include two types of questions: relevant ones about a specific incident ('Did you leak classified information to The New York Times?') and broader so-called control questions ('Have you ever lied to anyone who trusted you?'). The test assumes that an innocent person telling the truth will have a stronger reaction to the control questions than to the relevant ones."
The trick is to learn how to conjure physical reactions that go against the test's expectations. Practice calming yourself when asked relevant questions — think of the beach or the mountains. Keep cool under pressure and the physiological readers won't know any better. Then practice frightening yourself when asked a control question. Imagine horrific images or distressing memories that will cause your heart rate to rise.
Many experts, ranging from the American Psychological Association to the United States Supreme Court, are unconvinced of the polygraph's supposed veracity. Doug Williams, a former police detective at the heart of Wollan's piece, calls the lie detector test "[an] insidious Orwellian instrument of torture," which I suppose means he's not a very big fan. What's clear is that the polygraph isn't entirely reliable, especially if the test-taker knows how to crack it. Understand how they work. Even someone like yourself could beat the lie detector — not that we necessarily endorse the idea of trying.
Read more at the New York Times
In the following Floating University video, Harvard professor and Big Think expert Steven Pinker explains how the contents and manner of speech offer a glimpse into the shape of our consciousness.
Photo credit: albund / Shutterstock
A federal judge ruled that the Trump administration likely violated the reporter's Fifth Amendment rights when it stripped his press credentials earlier this month.
- Acosta will be allowed to return to the White House on Friday.
- The judge described the ruling as narrow, and didn't rule one way or the other on violations of the First Amendment.
- The case is still open, and the administration may choose to appeal the ruling.
Progressive America would be half as big, but twice as populated as its conservative twin.
- America's two political tribes have consolidated into 'red' and 'blue' nations, with seemingly irreconcilable differences.
- Perhaps the best way to stop the infighting is to go for a divorce and give the two nations a country each
- Based on the UN's partition plan for Israel/Palestine, this proposal provides territorial contiguity and sea access to both 'red' and 'blue' America
The definition of a kilogram will now be fixed to Planck's constant, a fundamental part of quantum physics.
- The new definition of a kilogram is based on a physical constant in quantum physics.
- Unlike the current definition of a kilogram, this measurement will never change.
- Scientists also voted to update the definitions of several other measurements in physics.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.