FDA Bans Breast Cancer Treatment Avastin
The Food and Drug Administration has banned a popular treatment for breast cancer, in use since 2008. Some patients claim the drug works; the FDA says the harms outweigh the benefits.
What's the Latest Development?
The FDA has banned Avastin, a popular breast cancer treatment, due to concerns over harmful side effects. The blockbuster pharmaceutical drug entered the market in 2008 through FDA's accelerated approval program but after subsequent tests, the health body declared that Avastin has not been shown to decrease tumor growth or increase life expectancy in breast cancer patients. It will continue to be prescribed, however, for other types of cancer including lung, kidney and brain.
What's the Big Idea?
The FDA's accelerated approval program is designed to get beneficial drugs to patients sooner. As a result, subsequent tests must be performed to guarantee the drugs are safe. In the case of Avastin, while some breast cancer patients have lobbied for the drug to remain on the market, FDA says the risks outweigh the benefits. It remains unclear whether insurance companies will continue to pay for the drug, which can costs upwards of $90,000 annually.
Photo credit: Shutterstock.com
Science and the squishiness of the human mind. The joys of wearing whatever the hell you want, and so much more.
- Why can't we have a human-sized cat tree?
- What would happen if you got a spoonful of a neutron star?
- Why do we insist on dividing our wonderfully complex selves into boring little boxes
Progressive America would be half as big, but twice as populated as its conservative twin.
- America's two political tribes have consolidated into 'red' and 'blue' nations, with seemingly irreconcilable differences.
- Perhaps the best way to stop the infighting is to go for a divorce and give the two nations a country each
- Based on the UN's partition plan for Israel/Palestine, this proposal provides territorial contiguity and sea access to both 'red' and 'blue' America
A guide to making difficult conversations possible—and peaceful—in an increasingly polarized nation.
- How can we reach out to people on the other side of the divide? Get to know the other person as a human being before you get to know them as a set of tribal political beliefs, says Sarah Ruger. Don't launch straight into the difficult topics—connect on a more basic level first.
- To bond, use icebreakers backed by neuroscience and psychology: Share a meal, watch some comedy, see awe-inspiring art, go on a tough hike together—sharing tribulation helps break down some of the mental barriers we have between us. Then, get down to talking, putting your humanity before your ideology.
- The Charles Koch Foundation is committed to understanding what drives intolerance and the best ways to cure it. The foundation supports interdisciplinary research to overcome intolerance, new models for peaceful interactions, and experiments that can heal fractured communities. For more information, visit charleskochfoundation.org/courageous-collaborations.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.