Fame Shortens People's Lives, Says New Study

Being successful and famous may mean a shorter life span, according to Australian researchers who combed through 1,000 consecutive New York Times obituaries published between 2009 and 2011.

What's the Latest Development?


Being successful and famous may mean a shorter life span, according to Australian researchers who combed through 1,000 consecutive New York Times obituaries published between 2009 and 2011. The scientists defined success as having a life that merited a death notice in the American paper of record. "Some of these people were considered to be both successful and famous, like those in performance and sports, and, to a lesser degree, writers and composers, while otherscategorized as business/military/political or professional/academic/religiouswere mostly just successful."

What's the Big Idea?

People who became both successful and famous were likely to die earlier than philanthropists, academics and doctors, who were more likely to die of natural causes. "The authors cite studies showing how drug use and other risky behavior is associated with fame (including later in life, once fame had faded), and question whether that, along with performance-enhancing behavior, might have played a role in the reduced life spans seen here. ... In this case, it would seem that fame isn't necessarily associated with more health risks, but instead that people who are successful but not famous may be predisposed to being healthier."

Read it at the Atlantic

Photo credit: Shutterstock.com

 

Related Articles

Scientists discover what caused the worst mass extinction ever

How a cataclysm worse than what killed the dinosaurs destroyed 90 percent of all life on Earth.

Credit: Ron Miller
Surprising Science

While the demise of the dinosaurs gets more attention as far as mass extinctions go, an even more disastrous event called "the Great Dying” or the “End-Permian Extinction” happened on Earth prior to that. Now scientists discovered how this cataclysm, which took place about 250 million years ago, managed to kill off more than 90 percent of all life on the planet.

Keep reading Show less

Why we're so self-critical of ourselves after meeting someone new

A new study discovers the “liking gap” — the difference between how we view others we’re meeting for the first time, and the way we think they’re seeing us.

New acquaintances probably like you more than you think. (Photo by Simone Joyner/Getty Images)
Surprising Science

We tend to be defensive socially. When we meet new people, we’re often concerned with how we’re coming off. Our anxiety causes us to be so concerned with the impression we’re creating that we fail to notice that the same is true of the other person as well. A new study led by Erica J. Boothby, published on September 5 in Psychological Science, reveals how people tend to like us more in first encounters than we’d ever suspect.

Keep reading Show less

NASA launches ICESat-2 into orbit to track ice changes in Antarctica and Greenland

Using advanced laser technology, scientists at NASA will track global changes in ice with greater accuracy.

Firing three pairs of laser beams 10,000 times per second, the ICESat-2 satellite will measure how long it takes for faint reflections to bounce back from ground and sea ice, allowing scientists to measure the thickness, elevation and extent of global ice
popular

Leaving from Vandenberg Air Force base in California this coming Saturday, at 8:46 a.m. ET, the Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite-2 — or, the "ICESat-2" — is perched atop a United Launch Alliance Delta II rocket, and when it assumes its orbit, it will study ice layers at Earth's poles, using its only payload, the Advance Topographic Laser Altimeter System (ATLAS).

Keep reading Show less