Facebook "Liking" Not Protected by the 1st Amendment

A federal judge has ruled that "liking" something on Facebook does not count as constitutionally protected speech. It is a decision that has confounded some law professors. 

What's the Latest Development?

A federal judge has ruled that clicking "like" on Facebook to express your support of something does not count as constitutionally protected free speech. The case was brought before the court after an employee at a Virginia sheriff's office was fired for "liking" an opposing candidate in a 2009 election. Judge Raymond Jackson of Federal District Court ruled that clicking the "like" button does not amount to expressive speech because, as there are no actual words involved in the process, it is not the same as writing a message and posting it on the site, which is protected as free speech.

What's the Big Idea?

The lawyer for the dismissed worker plans to appeal the case, which does not surprise Marc Messner, a journalism and mass communications professor at Virginia Commonwealth University. "Going to a candidate’s Facebook page and liking it, in my view, is a political statement," Mr. Messner said. "It’s not a very deep one, but you’re making a statement." Other critics of the ruling point out that giving a real thumbs up sign (with your actual hand) has already been established as protected speech. Eugene Volokh, a law professor at UCLA, said "liking" something on Facebook is more expressive still because it generates text on a computer screen. 

Photo credit: Shutterstock.com


LinkedIn meets Tinder in this mindful networking app

Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.

Getty Images
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.

No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.

Keep reading Show less

26 ultra-rich people own as much as the world's 3.8 billion poorest

The Oxfam report prompted Anand Giridharadas to tweet: "Don't be Pinkered into everything's-getting-better complacency."

Getty Images and Wikimedia Commons
Politics & Current Affairs
  • A new report by Oxfam argues that wealth inequality is causing poverty and misery around the world.
  • In the last year, the world's billionaires saw their wealth increase by 12%, while the poorest 3.8 billion people on the planet lost 11% of their wealth.
  • The report prompted Anand Giridharadas to tweet: "Don't be Pinkered into everything's-getting-better complacency." We explain what Steven Pinker's got to do with it.
Keep reading Show less

People who constantly complain are harmful to your health

Moans, groans, and gripes release stress hormones in the brain.

Photo credit: Getty Images / Stringer

Could you give up complaining for a whole month? That's the crux of this interesting piece by Jessica Hullinger over at Fast Company. Hullinger explores the reasons why humans are so predisposed to griping and why, despite these predispositions, we should all try to complain less. As for no complaining for a month, that was the goal for people enrolled in the Complaint Restraint project.

Participants sought to go the entirety of February without so much as a moan, groan, or bellyache.

Keep reading Show less
  • Facebook and Google began as companies with supposedly noble purposes.
  • Creating a more connected world and indexing the world's information: what could be better than that?
  • But pressure to return value to shareholders came at the expense of their own users.
Keep reading Show less