It's Selfish to Withhold Negative Feedback
Dr. Christian Jarrett points out that neuroscience is helping us understand how negative feedback is essential to helping others improve.
When Jonathan Ive, Apple's senior vice president of design, threw a softball to his designers after they underperformed on a project, Steve Jobs countered Ive by saying: "You don't care about their feelings. You just want to be liked."
Perhaps offering negative feedback is part of what made Jobs such a successful executive, despite it giving him the appearance of a hackled porcupine. As Dr. Christian Jarrett points out, neuroscience is helping us understand that negative feedback is essential to helping others improve. Keeping quiet, either out of wanting to be liked or for fear of reprisal, will never help others improve — or help them achieve their larger goals.
"Explaining to someone the modifiable, external factors that contributed to their poor performance ('This article fell short because it wasn’t based on enough research insights') is more likely to result in them reacting in a constructive way to the criticism."
Numerous studies have found that offering constructive negative feedback is a tricky thing to do. The Journal of Applied Social Psychology published a study that found purely negative responses to someone's efforts provoked a chain of negative emotion. Because negativity is perceived as a threat, our natural response is to become defensive and avoid any future engagement.
On the other hand, when criticism is given with the intention of improving future work, it is received more willingly. The Journal of Psychology notes that feedback should focus primarily on ways to improve the skills someone already has rather than criticizing them for failure or inattentiveness.
Of course the burden of constructive criticism doesn't fall entirely on the person giving feedback. It's equally important to know how to receive feedback, as Harvard Law School lecturer Douglas Stone explains:
Read more at 99u.
Delay, deny and deflect were the strategies Facebook has used to navigate scandals it's faced in recent years, according to the New York Times.
- The exhaustive report is based on interviews with more than 50 people with ties to the company.
- It outlines how senior executives misled the public and lawmakers in regards to what it had discovered about privacy breaches and Russian interference in U.S. politics.
- On Thursday, Facebook cut ties with one of the companies, Definers Public Relations, listed in the report.
Protected animals are feared to be headed for the black market.
Sure we know it would be bad, but what do all of these scary numbers really mean?
- At the press time, the value was $21.7 trillion dollars.
- Lots of people know that a default would be bad, but not everybody seems to get how horrible it would be.
- While the risk is low, knowing what would happen if a default did occur is important information for all voters.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.