Could Paying Kidney Donors Save Money In The Long Run?
A study claims that, compared to the current donation system, offering donors $10,000 for their kidney would improve health outcomes and, consequently, lower costs.
What's the Latest Development?
In a paper published this week in Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, University of Calgary researcher Lianne Barnieh and her team crunched the numbers to find out what it would mean to pay people $10,000 for their kidney. They found that over time, assuming a five-percent increase in the number of kidneys available for transplant, the health care system would save $340 over the lifetime of each patient through improved overall net health. Barnieh says they put the price of donation at $10,000 because "we didn't want it to be so much money that it would change someone's life completely...[but] a compensation for the pain and suffering. And to tip the balance of those who are maybe considering donation."
What's the Big Idea?
Under the current, uncompensated donation system, demand far outstrips supply, and experts from a wide range of disciplines have wrestled with ways to correct the imbalance. Naturally, any suggestion of paying for organs raises concerns among bioethicists such as NYU's Arthur Caplan: "A large number of people would not support this strategy...You don't want to make organ donation into an abortion debate." Another approach, which requires people to opt out rather than opt in, is proving successful in countries such as Spain.
Photo Credit: Shutterstock.com
Malcolm Gladwell teaches "Get over yourself and get to work" for Big Think Edge.
- Learn to recognize failure and know the big difference between panicking and choking.
- At Big Think Edge, Malcolm Gladwell teaches how to check your inner critic and get clear on what failure is.
- Subscribe to Big Think Edge before we launch on March 30 to get 20% off monthly and annual memberships.
Can sensitive coral reefs survive another human generation?
- Coral reefs may not be able to survive another human decade because of the environmental stress we have placed on them, says author David Wallace-Wells. He posits that without meaningful changes to policies, the trend of them dying out, even in light of recent advances, will continue.
- The World Wildlife Fund says that 60 percent of all vertebrate mammals have died since just 1970. On top of this, recent studies suggest that insect populations may have fallen by as much as 75 percent over the last few decades.
- If it were not for our oceans, the planet would probably be already several degrees warmer than it is today due to the emissions we've expelled into the atmosphere.
Research has shown that men today have less testosterone than they used to. What's happening?
- Several studies have confirmed that testosterone counts in men are lower than what they used to be just a few decades ago.
- While most men still have perfectly healthy testosterone levels, its reduction puts men at risk for many negative health outcomes.
- The cause of this drop in testosterone isn't entirely clear, but evidence suggests that it is a multifaceted result of modern, industrialized life.
Michael Dowling, Northwell Health's CEO, believes we're entering the age of smart medicine.
- The United States health care system has much room for improvement, and big tech may be laying the foundation for those improvements.
- Technological progress in medicine is coming from two fronts: medical technology and information technology.
- As information technology develops, patients will become active participants in their health care, and value-based care may become a reality.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.