Computer Virus Fuels Talks of Political Cyber War
A recent computer virus highlighted by cyber security is believed to be politically influenced for use against Iran. This new information leads cyber researchers to believe governments may possibly be headed into a cyber war.
Article written by guest writer Rin Mitchell
What’s the Latest Development?
The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) issued a security alert about a new computer virus, reportedly out to target Iran. The virus, called Flame, was identified by an ITU-appointed Russian security consultant—while investigating detrimental software travelling throughout the Middle East. The ITU believes the virus, which was erasing data in the Middle East, was created by a government. The U.S. and Israel governments are under suspicion. The consultant concluded that Flame is a “highly sophisticated cyber weapon." The more information searchers are discovering about computer viruses indicate countries could be gearing up to go to war in cyber space.
What’s the Big Idea?
The ITU wants some kind of cyber-peace treaty in place that will outlaw some computer weapons. The ITU is still determining the origin of the newly discovered virus. According to reports, former President George W. Bush and President Barack Obama “both authorized computer attacks against Iran, culminating in the Stuxnet virus, which targeted Iranian nuclear facilities.” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has recently formed a new coalition government, and continues “threatening a preemptive attack” to stop the Iranian nuclear program.
The ability to speak clearly, succinctly, and powerfully is easier than you think
The ability to communicate effectively can make or break a person's assessment of your intelligence, competence, and authenticity.
Antimicrobial resistance is growing worldwide, rendering many "work horse" medicines ineffective. Without intervention, drug-resistant pathogens could lead to millions of deaths by 2050. Thankfully, companies like Pfizer are taking action.
- Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens are one of the largest threats to global health today.
- As we get older, our immune systems age, increasing our risk of life threatening infections. Without reliable antibiotics, life expectancy could decline for the first time in modern history.
- If antibiotics become ineffective, common infections could result in hospitalization or even death. Life-saving interventions like cancer treatments and organ transplantation would become more difficult, more often resulting in death. Routine procedures would become hard to perform.
- Without intervention, resistant pathogens could result in 10 million annual deaths by 2050.
- By taking a multi-faceted approach—inclusive of adherence to good stewardship, surveillance and responsible manufacturing practices, as well as an emphasis on prevention and treatment—companies like Pfizer are fighting to help curb the spread.
Journalism got a big wake up call in 2016. Can we be optimistic about the future of media?
- "[T]o have a democracy that thrives and actually that manages to stay alive at all, you need regular citizens being able to get good, solid information," says Craig Newmark.
- The only constructive way to deal with fake news? Support trustworthy media. In 2018, Newmark was announced as a major donor of two new media organizations, The City, which will report on New York City-area stories which may have otherwise gone unreported, and The Markup, which will report on technology.
- Greater transparency of fact-checking within media organizations could help confront and correct fake news. Organizations already exist to make media more trustworthy — are we using them? There's The Trust Project, International Fact-Checkers Network, and Tech & Check.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.