Societies Don't Need an All-Powerful God to Thrive
New anthropological research demonstrates that belief in an all-powerful God is not essential to the formation and development of complex society.
Anthropological research demonstrates that belief in an all-powerful God is not essential to the formation and development of complex societies.
Canadian researchers previously argued that a singular, moralizing God allowed societies to establish order when population growth outpaced the society's ability to police moral action.
But new analyses of religious systems that pervaded certain island chains — those running from Madagascar to Easter Island — challenge this notion. Now researchers say that having a singular moral authority is not strictly necessary to enforce the social norms that bind society.
For the new study, anthropologists from the University of Auckland in New Zealand looked at isolated societies that were (a) politically complex, (b) had identifiable systems of deities, and (c) were free of influence from dominant faiths like Islam and Christianity.
Belief in supernatural punishment was enough to stem the tide of social transgression whether or not that punishment came from a singular deity. Belief in ancestor spirits or karma, for example, facilitated enough social order to provide stability.
Today, science more often rules our sense of order than ancestral spirits or the cosmic justice of karma. So does religion still have a role in society? The Pew Research Center has found that the majority of people who consider spirituality important do not identify with a specific religion.
Journalist and scholar Robert Wright affirms that there is a place for religious faith, but it must stay in the moral arena and not challenge scientific findings.
Image courtesy of Shutterstock
Giving our solar system a "slap in the face"
- A stream of galactic debris is hurtling at us, pulling dark matter along with it
- It's traveling so quickly it's been described as a hurricane of dark matter
- Scientists are excited to set their particle detectors at the onslffaught
Bernardo Kastrup proposes a new ontology he calls “idealism” built on panpsychism, the idea that everything in the universe contains consciousness. He solves problems with this philosophy by adding a new suggestion: The universal mind has dissociative identity disorder.
There’s a reason they call it the “hard problem.” Consciousness: Where is it? What is it? No one single perspective seems to be able to answer all the questions we have about consciousness. Now Bernardo Kastrup thinks he’s found one. He calls his ontology idealism, and according to idealism, all of us and all we perceive are manifestations of something very much like a cosmic-scale dissociative identity disorder (DID). He suggests there’s an all-encompassing universe-wide consciousness, it has multiple personalities, and we’re them.
Once again, our circadian rhythm points the way.
- Seven individuals were locked inside a windowless, internetless room for 37 days.
- While at rest, they burned 130 more calories at 5 p.m. than at 5 a.m.
- Morning time again shown not to be the best time to eat.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.