Societies Don't Need an All-Powerful God to Thrive

New anthropological research demonstrates that belief in an all-powerful God is not essential to the formation and development of complex society.

Anthropological research demonstrates that belief in an all-powerful God is not essential to the formation and development of complex societies.

Canadian researchers previously argued that a singular, moralizing God allowed societies to establish order when population growth outpaced the society's ability to police moral action.

But new analyses of religious systems that pervaded certain island chains — those running from Madagascar to Easter Island — challenge this notion. Now researchers say that having a singular moral authority is not strictly necessary to enforce the social norms that bind society.

For the new study, anthropologists from the University of Auckland in New Zealand looked at isolated societies that were (a) politically complex, (b) had identifiable systems of deities, and (c) were free of influence from dominant faiths like Islam and Christianity.

Belief in supernatural punishment was enough to stem the tide of social transgression whether or not that punishment came from a singular deity. Belief in ancestor spirits or karma, for example, facilitated enough social order to provide stability.

Today, science more often rules our sense of order than ancestral spirits or the cosmic justice of karma. So does religion still have a role in society? The Pew Research Center has found that the majority of people who consider spirituality important do not identify with a specific religion.

Journalist and scholar Robert Wright affirms that there is a place for religious faith, but it must stay in the moral arena and not challenge scientific findings.

Image courtesy of Shutterstock

LinkedIn meets Tinder in this mindful networking app

Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.

Getty Images
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.

No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.

Keep reading Show less

Brain study finds circuits that may help you keep your cool

Research by neuroscientists at MIT's Picower Institute for Learning and Memory helps explain how the brain regulates arousal.

Photo by CHARLY TRIBALLEAU / AFP/ Getty Images
Mind & Brain

MIT News

The big day has come: You are taking your road test to get your driver's license. As you start your mom's car with a stern-faced evaluator in the passenger seat, you know you'll need to be alert but not so excited that you make mistakes. Even if you are simultaneously sleep-deprived and full of nervous energy, you need your brain to moderate your level of arousal so that you do your best.

Keep reading Show less

34 years ago, a KGB defector chillingly predicted modern America

A disturbing interview given by a KGB defector in 1984 describes America of today and outlines four stages of mass brainwashing used by the KGB.

Politics & Current Affairs
  • Bezmenov described this process as "a great brainwashing" which has four basic stages.
  • The first stage is called "demoralization" which takes from 15 to 20 years to achieve.
  • According to the former KGB agent, that is the minimum number of years it takes to re-educate one generation of students that is normally exposed to the ideology of its country.
Keep reading Show less

How pharmaceutical companies game the patent system

When these companies compete, in the current system, the people lose.

Politics & Current Affairs
  • When a company reaches the top of the ladder, they typically kick it away so that others cannot climb up on it. The aim? So that another company can't compete.
  • When this phenomenon happens in the pharmaceutical world, companies quickly apply for broad protection of their patents, which can last up to 20 years, and fence off research areas for others. The result of this? They stay at the top of the ladder, at the cost of everyday people benefitting from increased competition.
  • Since companies have worked out how to legally game the system, Amin argues we need to get rid of this "one size fits all" system, which treats product innovation the same as product invention. Companies should still receive an incentive for coming up with new products, he says, but not 20 years if the product is the result of "tweaking" an existing one.