Can Human Genes Be Patented? Supreme Court to Decide.
Doctors and medical professionals critical of patents on individual human genes have won their day before the Supreme Court, arguing that monopolies on scientific research are harmful.
What's the Latest Development?
The US Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case over whether individual human genes can be patented. The Court's decision will uphold or overturn a decision made by the a divided federal appeals court in Washington. The three-judge panel ruled in favor of Myriad Genetics, a Utah company which holds patents on genes that correlate with increased risk of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. "The isolated DNA molecules before us are not found in nature," wrote Judge Alan D. Lourie, who was in the majority. "They are obtained in the laboratory and are man-made, the product of human ingenuity."
What's the Big Idea?
Patents held by Myriad Genetics have been challenged by doctors and medical researchers who argue that the company's monopolistic right to certain genes inhibits beneficial research. "Myriad and other gene patent holders have gained the right to exclude the rest of the scientific community from examining the naturally occurring genes of every person in the United States," the plaintiffs told the Supreme Court in their petition seeking review. "The legal question for the justices is whether isolated genes are 'products of nature' that may not be patented or 'human-made inventions' eligible for patent protection."
Photo credit: Shutterstock.com
How a cataclysm worse than what killed the dinosaurs destroyed 90 percent of all life on Earth.
While the demise of the dinosaurs gets more attention as far as mass extinctions go, an even more disastrous event called "the Great Dying” or the “End-Permian Extinction” happened on Earth prior to that. Now scientists discovered how this cataclysm, which took place about 250 million years ago, managed to kill off more than 90 percent of all life on the planet.
A new study discovers the “liking gap” — the difference between how we view others we’re meeting for the first time, and the way we think they’re seeing us.
We tend to be defensive socially. When we meet new people, we’re often concerned with how we’re coming off. Our anxiety causes us to be so concerned with the impression we’re creating that we fail to notice that the same is true of the other person as well. A new study led by Erica J. Boothby, published on September 5 in Psychological Science, reveals how people tend to like us more in first encounters than we’d ever suspect.
Using advanced laser technology, scientists at NASA will track global changes in ice with greater accuracy.
Leaving from Vandenberg Air Force base in California this coming Saturday, at 8:46 a.m. ET, the Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite-2 — or, the "ICESat-2" — is perched atop a United Launch Alliance Delta II rocket, and when it assumes its orbit, it will study ice layers at Earth's poles, using its only payload, the Advance Topographic Laser Altimeter System (ATLAS).
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.