Baby, You Can Drive My (Robot) Car

Researchers are using robotics to create machines that will allow babies with motor skill challenges to move themselves. Theoretically, this will help their brain development match that of their typically-developing peers.

Article written by guest writer Kecia Lynn

What's the Latest Development?

Occupational therapy scientists at Ithaca College recently reported in the journal Physiotherapy about their latest project, a kind of mobile apparatus that's controlled entirely by the baby sitting in it. The WeeBot combines Nintendo Wii technology with robotics to move in the direction the infant leans, and uses sonar to keep it from bumping into things. It was first tested using "five- to nine-month-old, typically developing babies...[who were trained] to drive by having their parents sit in front of them and offer them a toy."

What's the Big Idea?

The Ithaca team is part of a larger field of research that focuses on providing disabled children with motion skills at earlier and earlier ages. The belief is that the ability to move independently creates major changes in infants' brains, and that robots like the Weebot may allow babies with motor skill challenges to "keep up with" their typically-developing peers. There are still some major bugs to work out, but while some think that research should remain confined to university labs, others believe it's time for commercial companies to jump on board. Physical therapist Cole Galloway suggests that researchers go directly to real-world consumers in search of test subjects: "There's [an] extra sparkle in kids' eyes when you hook them up [with a robot]."

Photo Credit:

'Upstreamism': Your zip code affects your health as much as genetics

Upstreamism advocate Rishi Manchanda calls us to understand health not as a "personal responsibility" but a "common good."

Sponsored by Northwell Health
  • Upstreamism tasks health care professionals to combat unhealthy social and cultural influences that exist outside — or upstream — of medical facilities.
  • Patients from low-income neighborhoods are most at risk of negative health impacts.
  • Thankfully, health care professionals are not alone. Upstreamism is increasingly part of our cultural consciousness.
Keep reading Show less

In U.S. first, drug company faces criminal charges for distributing opioids

It marks a major shift in the government's battle against the opioid crisis.

George Frey/Bloomberg via Getty Images
Politics & Current Affairs
  • The nation's sixth-largest drug distributor is facing criminal charges related to failing to report suspicious drug orders, among other things.
  • It marks the first time a drug company has faced criminal charges for distributing opioids.
  • Since 1997, nearly 222,000 Americans have died from prescription opioids, partly thanks to unethical doctors who abuse the system.
Keep reading Show less

Scientists create a "lifelike" material that has metabolism and can self-reproduce

An innovation may lead to lifelike evolving machines.

Shogo Hamada/Cornell University
Surprising Science
  • Scientists at Cornell University devise a material with 3 key traits of life.
  • The goal for the researchers is not to create life but lifelike machines.
  • The researchers were able to program metabolism into the material's DNA.
Keep reading Show less

Calling out Cersei Lannister: Elizabeth Warren reviews Game of Thrones

The real Game of Thrones might be who best leverages the hit HBO show to shape political narratives.

Photo credit: Mario Tama / Getty Images
Politics & Current Affairs
  • Sen. Elizabeth Warren argues that Game of Thrones is primarily about women in her review of the wildly popular HBO show.
  • Warren also touches on other parallels between the show and our modern world, such as inequality, political favoritism of the elite, and the dire impact of different leadership styles on the lives of the people.
  • Her review serves as another example of using Game of Thrones as a political analogy and a tool for framing political narratives.
Keep reading Show less