Avoid Impulse Eating By Feeding Your Emotional Hunger
The urge to eat when you're not hungry can be a crutch that prevents you from addressing a mental or emotional affliction. Find out the cause of your real hunger and leave the pumpkin pie in the fridge.
We've all been here:
Lunch was only an hour ago but you're standing over a piece of chocolate cake analyzing the most efficient way to transfer it from plate to stomach. You're not even hungry but the urge to consume that thing overpowers any feeble bits of logic your brain can launch in opposition. You know you shouldn't eat it. You're totally going to regret it later. But you just can't help it.
Why do we eat when we're not hungry? According to Dr. Suzanne Gelb, it's to temper a different sort of hunger, be it emotional, mental, or spiritual. The key to overcoming our urges is to identify the causes of our real hunger and enact solutions to erase them. Impulse eating is a band-aid solution. Introspection is the antibiotic.
Gelb's suggested strategy is to make a list of all the things you're really hungry for. It could be adventure or a relationship or a new job. Formulate strategies for how you're going to satisfy these hungers. Compose this list every time you have the unhealthy urge to eat and refocus yourself toward finding solutions. Just remember that giving in to the cake won't solve your problems.
Gelb offers some additional strategies in her article (linked again below) for fighting impulse eating. Take a look and let us know what you think.
Read more at Psych Central
Photo credit: Stokkete / Shutterstock
Research in plant neurobiology shows that plants have senses, intelligence and emotions.
- The field of plant neurobiology studies the complex behavior of plants.
- Plants were found to have 15-20 senses, including many like humans.
- Some argue that plants may have awareness and intelligence, while detractors persist.
Most people think human extinction would be bad. These people aren't philosophers.
- A new opinion piece in The New York Times argues that humanity is so horrible to other forms of life that our extinction wouldn't be all that bad, morally speaking.
- The author, Dr. Todd May, is a philosopher who is known for advising the writers of The Good Place.
- The idea of human extinction is a big one, with lots of disagreement on its moral value.
Since the idea of locality is dead, space itself may not be an aloof vacuum: Something welds things together, even at great distances.
- Realists believe that there is an exactly understandable way the world is — one that describes processes independent of our intervention. Anti-realists, however, believe realism is too ambitious — too hard. They believe we pragmatically describe our interactions with nature — not truths that are independent of us.
- In nature, properties of Particle B may depend on what we choose to measure or manipulate with Particle A, even at great distances.
- In quantum mechanics, there is no explanation for this. "It just comes out that way," says Smolin. Realists struggle with this because it would imply certain things can travel faster than light, which still seems improbable.