Jaron Lanier: Why Facebook Isn't Free

Internet pioneer Jaron Lanier argues that free technologies like Facebook come with a hidden and heavy cost – the livelihoods of their consumers. 

What’s the Big Idea?  

Facebook shares start trading today, at a price that will value the company at close to $100 billion, or roughly the 2011 GDP of Sudan. The difference between this and other comparably enormous initial public offerings is that Facebook's product, or service, is free. Its business model is based on the value to advertisers of the rich data its users provide by sharing their changing interests and relationship networks in real time. 

The "big data" that Facebook and other networks gather is especially valuable because of its level of detail. It goes far deeper than registration demographics: geography, age, gender, education - enabling marketers to target you, the consumer, based on up-to-the moment details like your favorite music, what shoes you bought last week, or your shifting political opinions.  

Jaron Lanier, a virtual reality pioneer (widely credited with inventing the term 'virtual reality'), musician, author of You Are Not A Gadget, and vocal opponent of what he sees as the widespread social conformity and economic unsustainability of Web 2.0, sees a hidden cost in the "free" services of the social web. 

Video: Jaron Lanier wants to see new technologies creating jobs and wealth, rather than undermining them. 

 

Just as Napster and its offspring slashed the monetary value of music, making it easier than ever for musicians to share their songs but harder than ever to make a living from them, Lanier sees the new generation of free social tools as concentrating wealth in the hands of a few programmers and their investors, rather than distributing it - through micropayments - to the users who provide the content. 

Jaron Lanier: It’s a second class kind of value. It's not non value. It is real value, but it's not the same kind that Facebook is raising in their IPO. It shrinks the economy gradually, so very gradually all the customers start to sink. Not all at once . . . It's a gradual process.

Some of the folks who started Facebook are friends of mine and I'm always bugging them about this and they'll see . . . 

What’s the Significance? 

The irony, says Lanier, is that businesses like Facebook ultimately undermine the spending power of their own user base. He cites the example of Walmart, which streamlined its buying and shipping processes so effectively that it put hundreds of competitors out of business, effectively impoverishing the communities in which it operates to a degree that has tarnished its brand and limited its future growth. Facebook’s “customers” don’t pay for the product itself, but our spending power is what makes us – and Facebook – valuable to marketers.  

In our rush to embrace new technologies without reflecting upon their social and economic impact, Lanier argues, we’re valuing digitized efficiency over human welfare. Lanier is by no means a Luddite – he works at Microsoft on the Kinect Motion Sensor – he’s just interested in a future where people get paid for the things they create. 

Figuring that he’d rather keep working on the Kinect, we asked Lanier what he would do if forced at gunpoint to take over Facebook tomorrow. Mark Zuckerberg, if you’re out there, I would love to hear a response. 

Jaron Lanier: I would turn it into this commerce platform so that people can send money around for things and then I'd gradually start to adjust it so people are monetizing more and more, so people can put up their art to sell to others either with a Kickstarter type of a thing or an app store kind of a thing.  It would have to be tweaked to find exactly the right model, but I would start to turn it into real commerce, so that people who were good at using Facebook start to make some money and the economy overall starts to expand instead of contract as a result of its existence. I think that's a happier outcome.  And it would create a better return for Facebook's investors in the long term. Even in the short term.

 


From life-saving apps to cutting-edge military defense, Big Think and Bing's Humanizing Technology Expo explores and expands the boundaries of what it means to be human, today and far into the future. 

Follow Jason Gots (@jgots) on Twitter

Compelling speakers do these 4 things every single time

The ability to speak clearly, succinctly, and powerfully is easier than you think

Former U.S. President Barack Obama speaks during a Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee rally at the Anaheim Convention Center on September 8, 2018 in Anaheim, California. (Photo by Barbara Davidson/Getty Images)
Personal Growth

The ability to communicate effectively can make or break a person's assessment of your intelligence, competence, and authenticity.

Keep reading Show less

This 5-minute neck scan can spot dementia 10 years before it emerges

The results come from a 15-year study that used ultrasound scans to track blood vessels in middle-aged adults starting in 2002.

Mikhail Kalinin via Wikipedia
Mind & Brain
  • The study measured the stiffness of blood vessels in middle-aged patients over time.
  • Stiff blood vessels can lead to the destruction of delicate blood vessels in the brain, which can contribute to cognitive decline.
  • The scans could someday become a widely used tool to identify people at high risk of developing dementia and Alzheimer's.
Keep reading Show less

Preserving truth: How to confront and correct fake news

Journalism got a big wake up call in 2016. Can we be optimistic about the future of media?

Videos
  • "[T]o have a democracy that thrives and actually that manages to stay alive at all, you need regular citizens being able to get good, solid information," says Craig Newmark.
  • The only constructive way to deal with fake news? Support trustworthy media. In 2018, Newmark was announced as a major donor of two new media organizations, The City, which will report on New York City-area stories which may have otherwise gone unreported, and The Markup, which will report on technology.
  • Greater transparency of fact-checking within media organizations could help confront and correct fake news. Organizations already exist to make media more trustworthy — are we using them? There's The Trust Project, International Fact-Checkers Network, and Tech & Check.
Keep reading Show less