how do we know anything? we don't
Sergio, you are asking question(s) that every human being benefits from assessing throughout their life. And accepting the humbling effect.
Pride is how humans supposedly reasoned, and continue to reason, things to a conclusive result. Obviously, there is nothing at fault with reasoning, and taking realistic pride in the process, it's when we decide a "belief" is the end point, a finality. And then teach, argue, persuade, manipulate, convince others of the same, without compromise.
Few things "make sense" exactly the way we insist they must. The average human is desperate to draw conclusions they can "bank on" at various stages of their life experience. This is based in fear, fear of the unknown or not "easily" understood. And that is what fear is based on, lack of knowledge, refusal to gain knowledge, and the like.
Most have been taught "to take pride in things, ideas and their selves," while over-the-top pride leads to conflict and disagreement. There's nothing amoral with having pride in one's heritage, team or "belief," until it results in separation of individuals and groups.
Relax with your current thoughts and I can assure you, you will gain enlightenment of a sort. Remember you are only being skeptical about things others have "reasoned" to conclusions, probably influencing your own ideas and beliefs, and these things are always open to evolution and clearer understanding. Even though you may have accepted or been taught they aren't.
You mentioned "basic assumptions." When you honestly look at that phraseology, you realize it's simply guess-timating.
Human beings are what we were, "Human Becomings" are what we can be.
Upstreamism advocate Rishi Manchanda calls us to understand health not as a "personal responsibility" but a "common good."
- Upstreamism tasks health care professionals to combat unhealthy social and cultural influences that exist outside — or upstream — of medical facilities.
- Patients from low-income neighborhoods are most at risk of negative health impacts.
- Thankfully, health care professionals are not alone. Upstreamism is increasingly part of our cultural consciousness.
The real Game of Thrones might be who best leverages the hit HBO show to shape political narratives.
- Sen. Elizabeth Warren argues that Game of Thrones is primarily about women in her review of the wildly popular HBO show.
- Warren also touches on other parallels between the show and our modern world, such as inequality, political favoritism of the elite, and the dire impact of different leadership styles on the lives of the people.
- Her review serves as another example of using Game of Thrones as a political analogy and a tool for framing political narratives.
A new study shows that some men's reaction to sex is not what you'd expect, resulting in a condition previously observed in women.
- Climate change is no longer a financial problem, just a political one.
- Mitigating climate change by decarbonizing our economy would add trillions of dollars in new investments.
- Public attitudes toward climate change have shifted steadily in favor of action. Now it's up to elected leaders.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.