Harvard Business School and the Question of Optimism Bias

All this gloomy economic talk has made concepts such as "transparency" popular, notes Harvard Business School professor James Heskett in a new paper. But evidence suggesting that phophecies are self-fulfilled is raising questions about whether it's a good idea for business leaders to be honest about how bad the future looks.

So what is the appropiate posture for leaders facing gloomy prospects and how closely connected are economics and psychology?

Heskett highlights a new book by Nobel-prize winner in economics George Akerlof and economist Robert Sheeler of "irrational exuberance" fame. These authors cite the importance of what John Maynard Keynes once referred to as "animal spirits" in dealing with economic issues, notes Heskett. The gist is that the more stories we tell about depression, the more likely we are to have one. If one subscribes to this line of thinking, avoiding the use of certain terms like "depression" may make sense.

The logical next question then is, "How frank should leaders be?" Jim Collins emphasizes the importance of organizations facing "the brutal facts" about causes of mediocre performance, notes Heskett. "On the other hand, there may be reasons why good leaders have to have an optimistic bias."

The ability of a naturally pessimistic—or realistic?—CEO to adversely affect everything from market reactions to employee morale and motivation may be substantial, thereby creating the wrong kind of self-fulfilling prophecy. After all, we applaud candor while sometimes penalizing those who pursue it. Just look at President Obama, whose honest assessment of the economy has been rewarded with further deterioration in a number of indicators, not the least of which is the stock market.

Heskett asks, To what degree do leaders owe it to others in their organizations to mask personal negative feelings in an effort to inspire good performance? How, if at all, should leaders employ self-fulfilling prophecies? When does such effort become unproductively deceptive? How frank or deceptive should leaders be?

Big Think would like to know your thoughts as well. Email sean@bigthink.com

LinkedIn meets Tinder in this mindful networking app

Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.

Getty Images
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.

No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.

Keep reading Show less

What’s behind our appetite for self-destruction?

Is it "perverseness," the "death drive," or something else?

Photo by Brad Neathery on Unsplash
Mind & Brain

Each new year, people vow to put an end to self-destructive habits like smoking, overeating or overspending.

Keep reading Show less

Physicists puzzled by strange numbers that could explain reality

Eight-dimensional octonions may hold the clues to solve fundamental mysteries.

Surprising Science
  • Physicists discover complex numbers called octonions that work in 8 dimensions.
  • The numbers have been found linked to fundamental forces of reality.
  • Understanding octonions can lead to a new model of physics.
Keep reading Show less

Douglas Rushkoff – It’s not the technology’s fault

It's up to us humans to re-humanize our world. An economy that prioritizes growth and profits over humanity has led to digital platforms that "strip the topsoil" of human behavior, whole industries, and the planet, giving less and less back. And only we can save us.

Think Again Podcasts
  • It's an all-hands-on-deck moment in the arc of civilization.
  • Everyone has a choice: Do you want to try to earn enough money to insulate yourself from the world you're creating— or do you want to make the world a place you don't have to insulate yourself from?
Keep reading Show less