Guest Thinkers

# NYC Earthquakicane Armageddon: Random distibutions and the folly of correlation

This week got me thinking – what are the chances that New York City could experience shaking from > M5 east coast earthquakeand potentially be struck by a Category 2-3 hurricane in the same week? I have no idea how to do that math – but I would venture to guess that the chances are very, very small (like ‘being killed by a banana that was dropped from a zeppelin’ small).

So, if we’re having two major events in the same week – earthquake and hurricane – how come nobody is trying to claim that they are related (well, nobody yet) to create an “earthquakicane”, but there are people trying to say that earthquakes on different sides of the continent (and planet) are directly related? I mean, what are the chances that we would have a > M5 earthquake in southern Colorado and in northern Virginia on the same day? That has to be related, right? Correlation means causation!

People outside after evacuating in New York City during the August 23, 2011 Virginia Earthquake.

The answer to that is a very likely “no.” We’ve talked about this before, but I think this week shows how easily the human mind tries to make correlations* between like events that are, for the most part, distributed randomly and doesn’t make that same connection between unlike events. I mean, unless you believe in HAARP nonsense or that the government is hiding the 2012 evidence, you would never think that a hurricane and earthquake were causally related, so why the jump to think that earthquakes thousands of miles apart would be related? I’m not sure, beyond the idea that humans love to put things in order – so why not lump earthquakes together? (Oh yeah, and we’re having more earthquakes, right?)

The next time we have a clustering of earthquakes around the globe, or a few volcanic eruptions in close temporal proximity, remember the NYC hurricane-earthquake week of 2011. Random distributions can cause clustering just as easily as it can cause quiet times. Armageddon it ain’t.

* By correlation here, I mean the idea that “A leads to B because they are close in time/space”, so I am wrapping the whole causation and correlation loop together. I’m find with correlation, it is the attribution of causation that requires exceptional proof.

Top left: Hurricane Irene seen on August 23, 2011.

Related
Defamiliarization is a common tool in the arts. Here we learn how seeing things from a different angle can lead to billion-dollar success.
In a world without clocks, people used common activities in place of time units. How long it took you to go to the toilet mattered.
In work and life, the rules of success are being redefined.
There are a few theories as to why we’ve never found other intelligent life in our Universe. Physicist Brian Cox walks us through them.
13 min
with
The laws of physics don't prefer matter over antimatter. So how can we be certain that distant stars & galaxies aren't made of antimatter?

Up Next
Ryan Blair, CEO and author of Nothing to Lose, Everything to Gain: How I Went From Gang Member to Multimillionaire Entrepreneur, argues that independent employees are good for business.