David Goggins
Former Navy Seal
Career Development
Bryan Cranston
Critical Thinking
Liv Boeree
International Poker Champion
Emotional Intelligence
Amaryllis Fox
Former CIA Clandestine Operative
Chris Hadfield
Retired Canadian Astronaut & Author
from the world's big
Start Learning

Working from home could be ruining your sleep. This light therapy lamp can help.

Light therapy might help your natural circadian rhythm and even stave off seasonal depression.

  • Night time artificial light has been shown to suppresses melatonin secretion and disrupt our natural circadian rhythm, negatively impacting our sleep.
  • Disruptions to our circadian rhythms potentially damage our psychological, metabolic, and cardiovascular functions.
  • The Aura Daylight Lamp can help restore your natural circadian rhythm.

Before the invention of artificial lighting, humans went to bed and woke up to the rhythm of the sun. While the benefits of the Industrial Age are numerous, our sleep patterns have been severely disrupted over the last two centuries. The technological age, with its flood of screens and distractions, has not made things better in that regard.

For those of us chasing a better night's sleep, though, there is hope.

The Aura Daylight Lamp is a light therapy tool invented by scientists and medical professionals to help restore your natural circadian rhythm and combat symptoms of Seasonal Affective Disorder. Many of us spend our lives indoors, shielded from the health effects of natural lighting. The 10,000 lux of bright light this lamp emits helps us beat the winter blues, circadian sleep disorders, work shift adjustment (like working from home!), daytime energy shifts, and even jet lag. The automatic timer is adjustable in 10-minute shifts so that you can control the amount of lighting you need.

There's a reason the Aura Daylight Lamp has a 4.4-star rating on Amazon. Pick one up today for only $94.99 and brighten your day.

Product Image 0

Prices subject to change.

When you buy something through a link in this article or from our shop, Big Think earns a small commission. Thank you for supporting our team's work.

More From Big Think
Related Articles

A new perfume can help you smell like an astronaut

Ever want to smell like a spacesuit? Now you can!

Eau De Space
Surprising Science
  • After years of trying, a group has produced the smell of outer space in a perfume.
  • Astronauts have described the smell of space as similar to "ozone," "gunpowder," and "fried steak."
  • Exactly what causes the scent is still debated.
Keep reading Show less

Humanity’s impact is monkeying with animals’ evolution

Animals are adapting all the time these days to stay out of our way.

Image source: Sergei Mironenko/Shutterstock
Surprising Science
  • If you don't want to get poached, try losing that trunk.
  • Pollution determines which moths dominate the tree trunks of the U.K.
  • More animals are becoming night owls.

We often think of evolution as taking place over extended periods of time as mutations prove themselves advantageous, or not. Mutations, though, are not rare things: They happen all the time. Scientists estimate that there were 37 trillion of them in your own body just over the last 24 hours. (It's amazing more things don't go wrong, right?) The characteristics we see in ourselves and other organisms are merely the latest winners in a wild and woolly mutation free-for-all competition, in which nature, or random chance, tries out many, many wonderful, bizarre, and ridiculous traits as things settle out over the long term.

Adaptations in response to changing environmental factors occur all the time, too: An attribute that may have been meaningless before may suddenly become very helpful. Here in the Anthropocene, animals are adapting to all sort of habitat changes we've imposed on them. While not yet long-term changes, necessarily, these characteristics suggest we may be having a considerable impact on the ongoing process of evolution in the world's organisms.

Industrialized moths

Image source: Marek R. Swadzba/Shutterstock

Before the Industrial Revolution got up and running in the U.K., light-colored pepper moths, Biston betularia morpha typica, were a common sight. However, by about 1864, they'd been essentially replaced by a darker pepper-moth cousin, Biston betularia morpha carbonaria. Why?

Pollutants — mostly coal soot —covered the British countryside, darkening its trees. Worse, sulfur dioxide emissions wiped out many of the trees' lichen and moss coverings. Against these darkened backdrops, light-colored pepper moths became far too easy to spot by predators. Better suited were the darker pepper moths, which soon came to dominate the habitat — by 1895, some 98% of pepper moths spotted were the darker variety.

Fortunately, the Industrial Revolution days passed, with dirty factories over time being replaced by cleaner alternatives, and today, the ligh-colored pepper moths are back on top.

The story is a pretty fast-paced and dramatic example of how extreme our impact can be, and also — and there's a hopeful feeling to this — how short- lived it can be if we fix what we've broken.


Urban vs. rural red fox skull measurements

Image source: K.J. Parsons, et al

NAs investigations continue apace into what, exactly, the fox says, researchers published in June a really interesting study regarding a surprising way in which foxes are adapt to life in human-dominated urban environments.

An examination of 111 red fox skulls from London, UK, revealed "urban individuals tending to have shorter and wider muzzles relative to rural individuals."Essentially, the more urban a fox's environment is, the shorter was its snout likely to be. The change may be considered an example of Darwin's "domestication syndrome," as Big Think has reported.

The study suggests it's all about the biomechanics benefits imparted by such a change:

"Firstly, a shorter snout, as found in urban foxes, should confer a higher mechanical advantage but with reduced closing speed of the jaw. This may be advantageous in an urban habitat where resources are more likely to be accessed as stationary patches of discarded human foods. Furthermore, in some cases, these foods may require a greater force to access them, explaining the expanded sagittal crest in skulls of urban foxes."

If these traits make an individual fox better suited to its city life, it's that much more likely to survive and reproduce than a longer-snouted competitor.

Nighttime on human Earth

Image source: Viktor Grishchenko/Shutterstock

Obviously, habitat loss is the single most destructive thing we're doing to animals. It can lead to utter displacement and death, and it can also change the way animals go about doing the things they need to do to survive.

In many cases, animals dealing with fresh human encroachment bend before they break, and some are trying to carry on around us, so to speak. A 2018 study in the journal Science, finds, for example, that animals are becoming more nocturnal to get out of the bipeds' way.

The authors of the study analyzed data from 76 other reports to learn how 62 species on six continents were trying to adapt to our intrusive presence. The data was sourced from all sorts of devices such as cameras to GPS trackers, and ran the gamut from 'possums to pachyderms.

What the researchers found was that animals known to split their activities between day and night were overwhelmingly becoming busier after dark. There was a 68% increase in nighttime activity among such animals.

If this habitat pressure continues, will we start to see individuals with, for example, better night vision, come to dominate as competitors for scarce resources? It'll be interesting to see.


When people say, "Such and such animal has this trait because it allows them to…" what they're really saying is that "Of all the crazy mutations that nature tried out, individuals with this mutation fared better than others did." Whether it's effective camouflage, the ditching of a trunk, or becoming a night owl — except for owls who already… never mind — temporary adaptations become fixed evolutionary traits when the conditions in which they're beneficial remain in place long enough. In the case of the pressure we're continually imposing on other life forms, it bears saying that only the ones lucky enough to survive humankind's challenging influence in the first place will get that chance to change.

R.P. Eddy wrote about a coming pandemic in 2017. Why didn't we listen?

In his book with Richard Clarke, Warnings, Eddy made clear this was inevitable.

Photo by Buda Mendes/Getty Images
  • In their 2017 book, Warnings, R.P. Eddy and Richard Clarke warned about a coming pandemic.
  • "You never get credit for correctly predicting an outbreak," says science journalist Laurie Garrett in the book.
  • In this interview with Big Think, R.P. Eddy explains why people don't listen to warnings—and how to try to get them to listen.
Keep reading Show less