Uncle Sam Wants YOU to Eat More Cheese

Guess what? Eating cheese isn't just a mindblowing sensual pleasure, it's also a patriotic duty. God bless America!


The U.S. Department of Agriculture is spending millions of tax dollars to help companies like Domino's Pizza infuse their products with ever-increasing amounts of cheese, according to a new investigative report by Michael Moss of the New York Times.

Last year, Domino's Pizza's profits were in the tank. So, the USDA-sponsored corporation Dairy Management was dispatched to help Domino's develop pizzas with 40% more cheese. DM spent $12 million dollars to market this new "Legends" line. The legendary Wisconsin pie features an astonishing eight kinds of cheese, six on top and two more in the crust.

So, why is Uncle Sam so keen on cheese? If you answered: "So we can develop strong teeth and healthy bones to better fight wars of conquest," you'd be wrong. Good guess, though.

Actually, this is a gimme for Big Dairy by way of fast food. Thanks to bovine growth hormone, high tech lighting, and other technical "advances," U.S. dairy farmers produce two thirds more milk than Americans want to drink. To add insult to injury, most consumers want low fat milk instead of whole. This leaves the dairy industry with a lot of extra milk fat, which is perfect for making cheese. You may be asking: "Couldn't they just make less milk?" Shut up, that's pinko talk.

For your information, Americans like cheese. A lot. Though, no admittedly, not so much that the Invisible Hand of the Market would serve up piping hot slices of Domino's Wisconsin Legend. For that, you need corporate welfare. Brings a whole new meaning to the term "government cheese" doesn't it? 

Here's where Dairy Management comes in. Funded by a levy on dairy producers and USDA grants, DM exists exhort and cajole Americans into doing our bit by scarfing up the national milk fat surplus. Think of the American people as 300,000,000 oil-eating bacteria patriotically munching our way to victory. 

One of the easiest strategies to boost sales is to convince fast food companies to spike their products with extra cheese. DM is all over this thing, like cheddar, pepper jack, and mozzarella on a Taco Bell quesadilla:

In 2007, the department highlighted Pizza Hut’s Cheesy Bites pizza, Wendy’s “dual Double Melt sandwich concept,” and Burger King’s Cheesy Angus Bacon cheeseburger and TenderCrisp chicken sandwich. “Both featured two slices of American cheese, a slice of pepper jack and a cheesy sauce,” the department said.

DM reported that its efforts boosted cheese sales by 30 million pounds that year.

That's small curds compared to the "Summer of Cheese," a joint effort by DM and Pizza Hut that shifted 100 million extra pounds of cheese from the stockpiles to the American consumer in 2002.

Americans now eat an average of 33 pounds of cheese a year, or nearly three times the rate in 1970. In addition to being rich in protein and calcium, cheese is high in saturated fat, salt, and calories. Cheese can be part of a healthy diet, just not in unlimited quantities.

DM's open-ended mandate to drive up cheese consumption to match supply is a very unhealthy public policy. As Michael Moss notes in the story, mindless cheese boosterism is in direct conflict with high profile initiatives by the White House and the USDA to combat obesity.

[Photo credit: Bill Barber, Creative Commons; Hat tip to my friend Eric Jaffa for sending me this remarkable story.]

​There are two kinds of failure – but only one is honorable

Malcolm Gladwell teaches "Get over yourself and get to work" for Big Think Edge.

Big Think Edge
  • Learn to recognize failure and know the big difference between panicking and choking.
  • At Big Think Edge, Malcolm Gladwell teaches how to check your inner critic and get clear on what failure is.
  • Subscribe to Big Think Edge before we launch on March 30 to get 20% off monthly and annual memberships.
Keep reading Show less

Apple, Amazon, and Uber are moving in on health care. Will it help?

Big tech is making its opening moves into the health care scene, but its focus on tech-savvy millennials may miss the mark.

Apple COO Jeff Williams discusses Apple Watch Series 4 during an event on September 12, 2018, in Cupertino, California. The watch lets users take electrocardiogram readings. (Photo: NOAH BERGER/AFP/Getty Images)
Sponsored by Northwell Health
  • Companies like Apple, Amazon, and Google have been busy investing in health care companies, developing new apps, and hiring health professionals for new business ventures.
  • Their current focus appears to be on tech-savvy millennials, but the bulk of health care expenditures goes to the elderly.
  • Big tech should look to integrating its most promising health care devise, the smartphone, more thoroughly into health care.
Keep reading Show less

The culprit of increased depression among teens? Smartphones, new research suggests.

A new study, led by psychologist Jean Twenge, points to the screen as the problem.

A teenager eyes her smartphone as people enjoy a warm day on the day of silence, one day prior to the presidential elections, when candidates and political parties are not allowed to voice their political meaning on April 14, 2018 in Kotor, Montenegro. Citizens from Montenegro, the youngest NATO member, will vote for a new president on Sunday 15 2018. (Photo by Pierre Crom/Getty Images)
Surprising Science
  • In a new study, adolescents and young adults are experiencing increased rates of depression and suicide attempts.
  • The data cover the years 2005–2017, tracking perfectly with the introduction of the iPhone and widespread dissemination of smartphones.
  • Interestingly, the highest increase in depressive incidents was among individuals in the top income bracket.
Keep reading Show less

The colossal problem with universal basic income

Here's why universal basic income will hurt the 99%, and make the 1% even richer.

Videos
  • Universal basic income is a band-aid solution that will not solve wealth inequality, says Rushkoff.
  • Funneling money to the 99% perpetuates their roles as consumers, pumping money straight back up to the 1% at the top of the pyramid.
  • Rushkoff suggests universal basic assets instead, so that the people at the bottom of the pyramid can own some means of production and participate in the profits of mega-rich companies.
Keep reading Show less