Kanazawa's Report of Black Female "Unattractiveness" Debunked By Independent Analysis

Dr. Scott Barry Kaufman and Jelte Wicherts analyzed the same data that LSE "evolutionary psychologist" Satoshi Kanazawa used in his attempt to prove that black women are "objectively" less attractive than women of other races. Kaufman's analysis shows that Kanazawa was even further off-base than he initially seemed. As it turns out black women were not even rated as less attractive on average than women of other races.

Kanazawa's analysis was invalid on its face because he used interviewers' subjective ratings of subjects' attractiveness as a measure of objective attractiveness. He forgot than an opinion about someone else's looks is still just an opinion. After that, everything he tried to do with his data was like building a skyscraper on Jello.

Kaufman's number-crunching takes the critique to the next level. The Add Health study started tracking thousands of teens in 1994-1995 when they were in grades 7-12 (Wave 1). The researchers re-interviewed these subjects in 1996 (Wave 2), in 2001-2002 (Wave 3), and again in 2007-2008 (Wave 4).

Kanazawa only used the data from the first three waves, even though data for Wave 4 had been out for about a month when he published his notorious blog post, Kaufman notes. This is a critical omission.

Kaufman's analysis found that black teen girls were rated less attractive on average, but that the rating gap had narrowed to the point of statistical insignificance by Wave 3 when the subjects were in their late teens through early twenties. By Wave 4, the difference had disappeared entirely.

The fact that Kanazawa left out the Wave 4 data raises troubling questions about his scientific integrity and his competence.

It's not clear why there was a perceived attractiveness gap early on, or why the gap closed.

Dare we hope that prevailing beauty standards became a little less racist between 1994 and 2008? Maybe path breaking women like Halle Berry, who became the first black woman to win an Academy Award for Best Actress in 2001, helped recalibrate America's beauty ideals.

[Photo credit: Bart van de Biezen, Creative Commons.]

LinkedIn meets Tinder in this mindful networking app

Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.

Getty Images
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.

No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.

Keep reading Show less

People who engage in fat-shaming tend to score high in this personality trait

A new study explores how certain personality traits affect individuals' attitudes on obesity in others.

Mind & Brain
  • The study compared personality traits and obesity views among more than 3,000 mothers.
  • The results showed that the personality traits neuroticism and extraversion are linked to more negative views and behaviors related to obesity.
  • People who scored high in conscientiousness are more likely to experience "fat phobia.
Keep reading Show less

4 anti-scientific beliefs and their damaging consequences

The rise of anti-scientific thinking and conspiracy is a concerning trend.

Moon Landing Apollo
  • Fifty years later after one of the greatest achievements of mankind, there's a growing number of moon landing deniers. They are part of a larger trend of anti-scientific thinking.
  • Climate change, anti-vaccination and other assorted conspiratorial mindsets are a detriment and show a tangible impediment to fostering real progress or societal change.
  • All of these separate anti-scientific beliefs share a troubling root of intellectual dishonesty and ignorance.
Keep reading Show less

Reigning in brutality - how one man's outrage led to the Red Cross and the Geneva Conventions

The history of the Geneva Conventions tells us how the international community draws the line on brutality.

Napoleon III at the Battle of Solferino. Painting by Adolphe Yvon. 1861.
Politics & Current Affairs
  • Henry Dunant's work led to the Red Cross and conventions on treating prisoners humanely.
  • Four Geneva Conventions defined the rules for prisoners of war, torture, naval and medical personnel and more.
  • Amendments to the agreements reflect the modern world but have not been ratified by all countries.
Keep reading Show less