Feds can't make up their mind regarding Internet filtering

[cross-posted at The Gate]


In case you haven't been following the issue, the federal government

can't make up its mind regarding Internet filtering. On the one hand,

government attorneys vigorously argued for Internet filtering

mechanisms as

part of the Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA), which was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2004:

A library's use of

filtering software to block material covered by CIPA is constitutional.

The district court itself found that filtering software is a reasonably

effective way to block pornographic material, and that such material falls

outside of a public library's traditional collection boundaries.

The district court's finding that filtering software erroneously blocks

some constitutionally protected speech does not undermine the reasonableness

of their use.

(see http://tinyurl.com/2omvsp)

In contrast, federal attorneys have attacked software filters as burdensome and ineffective in their attempts to defend the Child Online Protection Act (COPA), which keeps getting blocked by federal courts:

The court of appeals also erred in holding that filtering software

is a sufficient alternative to COPA's mandatory screening requirement. Filtering

software is not nearly as effective as COPA's screening requirement in shielding

minors from commercial domestic pornography on the Web. Filtering software

is voluntary, while COPA's screening requirement is mandatory. Filtering

software also blocks some sites that are not harmful; it fails to block

some sites that are harmful; it can be expensive for parents to purchase;

and it quickly becomes outdated. Congress also did not view mandatory screening

and blocking software as an either or choice. It mandated screening and

encouraged the use of blocking software as well. That combined approach

is far more effective than the use of voluntary blocking software alone.

(see http://tinyurl.com/322qnc)

Huh?

Why American history lives between the cracks

The stories we tell define history. So who gets the mic in America?

Videos
  • History is written by lions. But it's also recorded by lambs.
  • In order to understand American history, we need to look at the events of the past as more prismatic than the narrative given to us in high school textbooks.
  • Including different voices can paint a more full and vibrant portrait of America. Which is why more walks of American life can and should be storytellers.
Keep reading Show less

Juice is terrible for children. Why do we keep giving it to them?

A glass of juice has as much sugar, ounce for ounce, as a full-calorie soda. And those vitamins do almost nothing.

Pixabay user Stocksnap
popular

Quick: think back to childhood (if you've reached the scary clown you've gone too far). What did your parents or guardians give you to keep you quiet? If you're anything like most parents, it was juice. But here's the thing: juice is bad for you. 

Keep reading Show less

Orangutans exhibit awareness of the past

Orangutans join humans and bees in a very exclusive club

(Eugene Sim/Shutterstock)
Surprising Science
  • Orangutan mothers wait to sound a danger alarm to avoid tipping off predators to their location
  • It took a couple of researchers crawling around the Sumatran jungle to discover the phenomenon
  • This ability may come from a common ancestor
Keep reading Show less