Feds can't make up their mind regarding Internet filtering

[cross-posted at The Gate]

In case you haven't been following the issue, the federal government

can't make up its mind regarding Internet filtering. On the one hand,

government attorneys vigorously argued for Internet filtering

mechanisms as

part of the Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA), which was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2004:

A library's use of

filtering software to block material covered by CIPA is constitutional.

The district court itself found that filtering software is a reasonably

effective way to block pornographic material, and that such material falls

outside of a public library's traditional collection boundaries.

The district court's finding that filtering software erroneously blocks

some constitutionally protected speech does not undermine the reasonableness

of their use.

(see http://tinyurl.com/2omvsp)

In contrast, federal attorneys have attacked software filters as burdensome and ineffective in their attempts to defend the Child Online Protection Act (COPA), which keeps getting blocked by federal courts:

The court of appeals also erred in holding that filtering software

is a sufficient alternative to COPA's mandatory screening requirement. Filtering

software is not nearly as effective as COPA's screening requirement in shielding

minors from commercial domestic pornography on the Web. Filtering software

is voluntary, while COPA's screening requirement is mandatory. Filtering

software also blocks some sites that are not harmful; it fails to block

some sites that are harmful; it can be expensive for parents to purchase;

and it quickly becomes outdated. Congress also did not view mandatory screening

and blocking software as an either or choice. It mandated screening and

encouraged the use of blocking software as well. That combined approach

is far more effective than the use of voluntary blocking software alone.

(see http://tinyurl.com/322qnc)


LinkedIn meets Tinder in this mindful networking app

Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.

Getty Images
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.

No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.

Keep reading Show less

What’s behind our appetite for self-destruction?

Is it "perverseness," the "death drive," or something else?

Photo by Brad Neathery on Unsplash
Mind & Brain

Each new year, people vow to put an end to self-destructive habits like smoking, overeating or overspending.

Keep reading Show less

Physicists puzzled by strange numbers that could explain reality

Eight-dimensional octonions may hold the clues to solve fundamental mysteries.

Surprising Science
  • Physicists discover complex numbers called octonions that work in 8 dimensions.
  • The numbers have been found linked to fundamental forces of reality.
  • Understanding octonions can lead to a new model of physics.
Keep reading Show less

Douglas Rushkoff – It’s not the technology’s fault

It's up to us humans to re-humanize our world. An economy that prioritizes growth and profits over humanity has led to digital platforms that "strip the topsoil" of human behavior, whole industries, and the planet, giving less and less back. And only we can save us.

Think Again Podcasts
  • It's an all-hands-on-deck moment in the arc of civilization.
  • Everyone has a choice: Do you want to try to earn enough money to insulate yourself from the world you're creating— or do you want to make the world a place you don't have to insulate yourself from?
Keep reading Show less