Too much innovation: Everybody must get stroned
Every week, the Wall Street Journal publishes a quick-and-dirty "Tricks of the Trade" column with an expert within a certain field. Some weeks, it might be a wine sommelier at a fancy restaurant explaining how to preserve a bottle of wine overnight, while other weeks, it might be a big-shot travel expert explaining how to save a few bucks on a travel reservation to Europe. (I find these types of insights strangely addictive, even if I don't actually get to use them.) So anyway, the topic of this week's column was "A salon owner shaves," and it featured the owner of a chain of private men's salons that provide grooming services to men. What better person to explain how to get a nice, close shave? After all, John Allan Meing ("John Allan" to his clients) also has a line of grooming products available at Saks Fifth Avenue and Barneys New York and considers himself something of a close shave expert.
That's why I was surprised to hear that he uses a Gillette Mach 3 blade -- something you can buy off-the-shelf at the local Duane Reade. As John Allan points out, "Three blades is enough. I tried five blades and didn't see a real benefit from it." Let me repeat: three blades is enough.
Which brings me to my innovation question of the day: Is there ever a case when you can have "too much" innovation? I think
that companies like Gillette have been laboring under this delusion,
with their breathless claims of brand-new technology ("Fusion," "Nitro") or
breakthrough shaving experiences (e.g. is Mach 3 a razor blade that functions at three
times the speed of sound?). For the past 50 to 60 years, in fact, the razor blade industry has always operated under this assumption -- that rapid, technological innovation with razor blades is the way to go. Referencing this 1948 vintage shaving advertisement, Corey Greenberg of the Shave Blog weighs in:
"Shavegeeks tend to romanticize the past, and I'm as guilty of it as
anyone. I talk about safety razors like they're some pure manifestation
of The Greatest Generation, used by JFK, Cary Grant, and Lee Marvin,
back when men were men and shaved like men, even though the women
probably had legs that felt more like Brokeback Mountain than
smooth 'n' silky.
But the more I delve into shaving's past, the
more I see that the times, they've never really a' changed much. Witness
this 1948 magazine advertisement for the then-new Schick/Eversharp
Injector safety razor, and its absurd claim that each and every blade
is to say, stropped and honed, like a straight razor's edge -- honed on
a whetstone, and stropped on a hanging leather strop. Serious he-men
wetshavers who use a straight razor have to periodically hone their
razors on a stone, and then before each and every shave, they swipe the
blade to and fro on a leather strop to keep the edge keen. But safety
I believe Schick was honing all of their
Injector blades -- all razor blades are "honed" in one way or another,
whether it's done with a stone or a laser beam. But am I really
supposed to believe Schick was stropping each and every Injector blade
with "30 ft. of leather" any more than I'm supposed to believe that the
Mach3 Power's "micro-pulses" make the shave closer?
How stroned do they think I am?"
[image: Shave Blog]
Journaling can help you materialize your ambitions.
- Organizing your thoughts can help you plan and achieve goals that might otherwise seen unobtainable.
- The Bullet Journal method, in particular, can reduce clutter in your life by helping you visualize your future.
- One way to view your journal might be less of a narrative and more of a timeline of decisions.
Progressive America would be half as big, but twice as populated as its conservative twin.
- America's two political tribes have consolidated into 'red' and 'blue' nations, with seemingly irreconcilable differences.
- Perhaps the best way to stop the infighting is to go for a divorce and give the two nations a country each
- Based on the UN's partition plan for Israel/Palestine, this proposal provides territorial contiguity and sea access to both 'red' and 'blue' America
New research links urban planning and political polarization.
- Canadian researchers find that excessive reliance on cars changes political views.
- Decades of car-centric urban planning normalized unsustainable lifestyles.
- People who prefer personal comfort elect politicians who represent such views.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.