"Ours is a living world of continuous creation and infinite variation"

\n

\nOver at the Great Human Capital blog, Margaret Wheatley has written a beautifully moving description of innovation that ties in to many of the themes that will appear here on the Endless Innovation site. According to Margaret, too many organizations fail on their innovation projects because they tend to think of themselves as mechanistic and machine-like. Once they learn to think of themselves as living, breathing systems, it all becomes a lot easier. Notice, too, how she brings up the notion of "continuous creation" and "infinite variation" by referring back to the natural world:


"The\nhuman capacity to invent and create is universal. Ours is a living\nworld of continuous creation and infinite variation. Scientists keep\ndiscovering more species; there may be more than 50 million of them on\nearth, each the embodiment of an innovation that worked.

\n\n

Yet\nwhen we look at our own species, we frequently say we’re "resistant to\nchange." Could this possibly be true? Are we the only species — out of\n50 million — that digs in its heels and resists? Or perhaps all those\nother creatures simply went to better training programs on "Innovation\nfor Competitive Advantage?"  [...]

\n\n

Now\nthat I understand people and organizations as living systems, filled\nwith the innovative dynamics characteristic of all life, many\nintractable problems have become solvable. Perhaps the most powerful\nexample in my own work is how relatively easy it is to create\nsuccessful organizational change if you start with the assumption that\npeople, like all life, are creative and good at change.\n

\n\n

Once\nwe stop treating organizations and people as machines and stop trying\nto reengineer them, once we move into the paradigm of living systems,\norganizational change is not a problem. Using this new worldview, it is\npossible to create organizations filled with people who are capable of\nadapting as needed, who are alert to changes in their environment, who\nare able to innovate strategically."

[image: The story of man]

\n\n

LinkedIn meets Tinder in this mindful networking app

Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.

Getty Images
Sponsored
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.

No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.

Keep reading Show less

People who engage in fat-shaming tend to score high in this personality trait

A new study explores how certain personality traits affect individuals' attitudes on obesity in others.

Pixabay
Mind & Brain
  • The study compared personality traits and obesity views among more than 3,000 mothers.
  • The results showed that the personality traits neuroticism and extraversion are linked to more negative views and behaviors related to obesity.
  • People who scored high in conscientiousness are more likely to experience "fat phobia.
Keep reading Show less

4 anti-scientific beliefs and their damaging consequences

The rise of anti-scientific thinking and conspiracy is a concerning trend.

Moon Landing Apollo
popular
  • Fifty years later after one of the greatest achievements of mankind, there's a growing number of moon landing deniers. They are part of a larger trend of anti-scientific thinking.
  • Climate change, anti-vaccination and other assorted conspiratorial mindsets are a detriment and show a tangible impediment to fostering real progress or societal change.
  • All of these separate anti-scientific beliefs share a troubling root of intellectual dishonesty and ignorance.
Keep reading Show less

Reigning in brutality - how one man's outrage led to the Red Cross and the Geneva Conventions

The history of the Geneva Conventions tells us how the international community draws the line on brutality.

Napoleon III at the Battle of Solferino. Painting by Adolphe Yvon. 1861.
Politics & Current Affairs
  • Henry Dunant's work led to the Red Cross and conventions on treating prisoners humanely.
  • Four Geneva Conventions defined the rules for prisoners of war, torture, naval and medical personnel and more.
  • Amendments to the agreements reflect the modern world but have not been ratified by all countries.
Keep reading Show less