Innovation: Revolution & Evolution

On Sunday night, CNBC aired the second part of its five-part Business of Innovation special: Revolution & Evolution. Episode Two of the series examines how some companies manage to innovate while others

in their same industry struggle to learn the secrets to their success. In some cases, companies focus on slow, incremental changes that lead to an evolutionary type of innovation; in other cases, they focus on rapid, breakthrough changes that lead to marketplace revolutions. It's not always easy, however, to capture "lightning in a bottle," which is why I'm in the "evolutionary innovation" camp.


Anyway, Maria Bartiromo (the lovely host of the show) does a great job

of sifting through the various viewpoints on innovation, but is plainly

struggling to come up with a unified theory of innovation. (She refers to innovation as "a maze") If you listen to her carefully, she seems to subscribe to the theory that every successful person who is well-known and powerful must be innovative. That's a nice start, but it inevitably leads to a lot of confusion, since every person has some kind of unique "secret sauce," such that the subject of innovation becomes as inscrutable and mysterious as ever.

After nearly every

speaker, Maria gushes how "fascinating" and "interesting" the views are,

and then dutifully presses on to the next interview. The guests on Episode

2 include Christie Hefner, CEO of Playboy; Terrell Jones, Founder of Travelocity.com; Tarquinio Teles, CEO of Hoplon Entertainment; Russell Simmons, CEO of Rush Communications; and Larry Huston; Former VP of R&D at Procter & Gamble. It's a unique mix of innovators, to be sure, but -- with the exception of Simmons -- we really don't hear a lot from them in any detail.

In addition, there are special segments featuring Alan Mulally of Ford Motor Company and Warren Buffett of Berkshire Hathaway, after which the guests of the show debate whether or not Ford and Berkshire Hathaway are innovative or not. Warren Buffett radiates a kind of folksy, don't-stir-the-pot type of charm and his investment ideas date back to the days of Benjamin Graham, yet Maria Bartiromo doggedly clings to the view that Buffett is some kind of master-innovator. Which led to my comment above -- that Maria views any super-successful person as being some kind of innovator. As much as I respect Buffett, take a look at his portfolio - it's chock-full of names like Coca-Cola. Good, solid, American companies, but nothing at all tech- or biotech-related (although I hear he's getting into foreign currency markets these days).

There's perhaps only one major complaint that I have about the show. The folks at CNBC decided to pair up Maria with co-host Roger Schank (pictured above), who has been variously identified on the program as the CEO of a company called Socratic Arts, a learning expert, an innovation expert, the former chair of the Yale computer science department, a computer entrepreneur, and a professor at Northwestern. Suffice it to say that he's had an interesting background and can probably approach innovation from a number of different perspectives. However, he's brash, abrasive and loud-mouthed -- so much so that he really detracts from the value of the show. Case in point: he practically yelled at legendary management guru Gary Hamel on the show, cutting him off mid-sentence. That may work on "Hardball" or "O'Reilly" but not on a serious business show. Roger is like a loud, aggressive bulldog confirming everyone's worst fears about innovators. Roger says that most companies are too stupid and too small-minded to ever become innovative. It may be the case, however, that they really don't want to deal with "bulldozers" like him. (his words, not mine)

[image: Maria and Roger on The Business of Innovation]

'Upstreamism': Your zip code affects your health as much as genetics

Upstreamism advocate Rishi Manchanda calls us to understand health not as a "personal responsibility" but a "common good."

Sponsored by Northwell Health
  • Upstreamism tasks health care professionals to combat unhealthy social and cultural influences that exist outside — or upstream — of medical facilities.
  • Patients from low-income neighborhoods are most at risk of negative health impacts.
  • Thankfully, health care professionals are not alone. Upstreamism is increasingly part of our cultural consciousness.
Keep reading Show less

Elizabeth Warren's plan to forgive student loan debt could lead to an economic boom

A plan to forgive almost a trillion dollars in debt would solve the student loan debt crisis, but can it work?

Photo credit: Drew Angerer / Getty Images
Politics & Current Affairs
  • Sen. Elizabeth Warren has just proposed a bold education reform plan that would forgive billions in student debt.
  • The plan would forgive the debt held by more than 30 million Americans.
  • The debt forgiveness program is one part of a larger program to make higher education more accessible.
Keep reading Show less

Banned books: 10 of the most-challenged books in America

America isn't immune to attempts to remove books from libraries and schools, here are ten frequent targets and why you ought to go check them out.

Nazis burn books on a huge bonfire of 'anti-German' literature in the Opernplatz, Berlin. (Photo by Keystone/Getty Images)
Culture & Religion
  • Even in America, books are frequently challenged and removed from schools and public libraries.
  • Every year, the American Library Association puts on Banned Books Week to draw attention to this fact.
  • Some of the books they include on their list of most frequently challenged are some of the greatest, most beloved, and entertaining books there are.
Keep reading Show less

Supreme Court to hear 3 cases on LGBT workplace discrimination

In most states, LGBTQ Americans have no legal protections against discrimination in the workplace.

(Photo by Andres Pantoja/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Politics & Current Affairs
  • The Supreme Court will decide whether the Civil Rights Act of 1964 also applies to gay and transgender people.
  • The court, which currently has a probable conservative majority, will likely decide on the cases in 2020.
  • Only 21 states and the District of Columbia have passed laws effectively extending the Civil Rights of 1964 to gay and transgender people.
Keep reading Show less