Cirque Du Soleil and the problem of Too Much Innovation
First of all, let me say that I love Cirque Du Soleil and I've been to one of their shows in New York City and one of their shows in Las Vegas. I've also rented a few of their DVDs on Netflix and consider them to be one of the most innovative performing artist groups in the world. (They were also mentioned in Blue Ocean Strategy as leading-edge innovators, which is pretty cool.) Which is why I was absolutely stunned - in a negative way - by their performance as part of the pre-game entertainment before the Super Bowl last night.
Quite simply, the performance was a mess. In my opinion, the organizers of the entertainment tried to blend together way too many thematic elements - at the same time as the Cirque Du Soleil performers were on the field, some sexy Latin singer was on a separate stage doing her thing and people completely unaffiliated with Cirque Du Soleil were running around the field, displaying artwork from a local Miami artist. Moreover, the circus performers were "dumbed down" for the mass audience. Most of them were dressed up like rabid college football fans (complete with face paint) and college marching band members and then forced to do the same repetitive acrobatics over and over and over again. On a big screen TV, the field in Miami just looked like an unintelligible and riotous clash of color and sound.
Which brings me to my point: sometimes too much innovation can be a bad thing. I still love and respect Cirque Du Soleil, but I don't think the performance last night was even close to what they could have achieved. While diversity of all kinds is good for the innovation process, there needs to be some way of filtering through all that innovation to find something that works. An "everything but the kitchen sink" strategy may work for some things, but not when it comes to innovation.
[image: Cirque Du Soleil at the Super Bowl]
The ability to speak clearly, succinctly, and powerfully is easier than you think
The ability to communicate effectively can make or break a person's assessment of your intelligence, competence, and authenticity.
Antimicrobial resistance is growing worldwide, rendering many "work horse" medicines ineffective. Without intervention, drug-resistant pathogens could lead to millions of deaths by 2050. Thankfully, companies like Pfizer are taking action.
- Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens are one of the largest threats to global health today.
- As we get older, our immune systems age, increasing our risk of life threatening infections. Without reliable antibiotics, life expectancy could decline for the first time in modern history.
- If antibiotics become ineffective, common infections could result in hospitalization or even death. Life-saving interventions like cancer treatments and organ transplantation would become more difficult, more often resulting in death. Routine procedures would become hard to perform.
- Without intervention, resistant pathogens could result in 10 million annual deaths by 2050.
- By taking a multi-faceted approach—inclusive of adherence to good stewardship, surveillance and responsible manufacturing practices, as well as an emphasis on prevention and treatment—companies like Pfizer are fighting to help curb the spread.
Journalism got a big wake up call in 2016. Can we be optimistic about the future of media?
- "[T]o have a democracy that thrives and actually that manages to stay alive at all, you need regular citizens being able to get good, solid information," says Craig Newmark.
- The only constructive way to deal with fake news? Support trustworthy media. In 2018, Newmark was announced as a major donor of two new media organizations, The City, which will report on New York City-area stories which may have otherwise gone unreported, and The Markup, which will report on technology.
- Greater transparency of fact-checking within media organizations could help confront and correct fake news. Organizations already exist to make media more trustworthy — are we using them? There's The Trust Project, International Fact-Checkers Network, and Tech & Check.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.